BTW there is a crazy spread between Rivera's bWAR and his fWAR, 56 vs. 39. He's not the only one with a big spread like that. Rick Porcello is another one.
Take a look at Rivera's postseason game log. He had a huge number of outings that were more than an inning. A pile of 2 inning outings. He was the farthest thing from a 9th inning only guy.
Closers might be overrated, but a good one is still nice to have. The leverage thing does matter, of course.
One of the things that made Rivera great was that when needed he could give you the 8th AND the 9th.
Yeah, I think the plan was all of a piece - slash payroll and get a CBO from the Rays organization who knows how to get more out of less.
The best laid plans of mice and men and John Henry.
From what we have observed about this Red Sox organization, I think that if it was Betts who was the instigator behind the trade, they would have very gladly leaked the story.
OK I'm nit-picking a bit about the $300 million number. It's just that Betts said there was no $300 million offer and Scott backed him up by saying it was nearly $300 million without saying how nearly.
Understood.
My position is that there's no evidence that Mookie wanted out or asked to be traded. That's all speculation. As far as I know no one in the organization has ever said this was the case. The simple fact is that the Red Sox traded him.
Well, a lot of this stuff is pretty subjective. But would you rather have a reliever that averages 1.8 WAR per 60 innings or a first baseman that averages 1.9 WAR per full season? One guy is among the elite at his position and the other is mediocre.