Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Right, but if he opts out, that could impact what they do about Mookie.
  2. It's an imperfect rhyme.
  3. Aren't you the same fellow who, whenever it's pointed out that 2003 'closer by committee' was a bust, points out that by the playoffs the bullpen was actually pretty good? Maybe it was someone else.
  4. Or Romero the Zero!
  5. The first big decision comes from JDM.
  6. One little side issue I'd like to raise is 'luck' vs. 'randomness'. I think there are some shades of difference between the two terms when applied to baseball, and there is also some crossover. For me, pure luck is something like Tony Clark's double bouncing into the stands in Game 5 of the 2004 ALCS and preventing what could have been the series-winning run from scoring. Pure randomness is something like a starting pitcher not having his best stuff on that particular day, as may have been the case with Cole in Game 1 of the WS. (On that point I'll refer once again to Mike Mussina's neat theorem that in 32 starts he would have everything working in 8 starts, nothing working in 8 starts, and something working in 16 starts.)
  7. It was Pedro's pitch count that was the issue. Grady was basically instructed by Theo to not let Pedro throw more than 105 pitches. Grady defied the order. It was ballsy of him, I'll say that much.
  8. I have set up a new thread for the 'playoffs are a crapshoot' topic.
  9. This question has been generating some debate again. I thought we should have a separate thread for it, and a poll to boot.
  10. It'll be a Cole day in Hell when we sign him.
  11. Plus 7-4 against the Rays & Yanks in the postseason.
  12. You gotta be kidding.
  13. Well, I'm afraid that wasn't much help. Kidding. I love philosophical stuff too.
  14. I pretty much agree. Baseball is a complex game at the major league level. Especially now with all the analytical and game-planning stuff. The "cheating" element can't be overlooked either-detecting pitch-tipping and stealing signs. That has become huge, for better or worse.
  15. So what exactly meets your definition of raw data?
  16. No, I agree that randomness is a big factor. I just think saying it's all luck once you get to the playoffs is overstating it.
  17. But on the Yankee thread you just said that the Yankees beat the Twins because they're the Twins, and that the Yankees over-reliance on bullpen contributed heavily to them losing to the Astros - implying that luck had little to do with either result.
  18. We also had Travis and Chavis who could play first. I'm not even sure why this is an issue.
  19. We've mentioned possible issues with his ability to play the position and injuries (back, Lisfranc). There's a pretty good chance he's a goner anyway, rendering all this a moot point.
  20. Greinke's payroll cost is not a killer. He's on the books for 2 years at a net AAV of about 24 mill per year after Arizona's contribution of 10.33 mill. Also woth noting is that Verlander's deal expires in 2021 just like Greinke's.
  21. He also had the Lisfranc injury in 2017.
  22. There are two possible downsides. One is he's not a good first baseman. The other is he's more subject to injury. Pretty much the same as they were for David Ortiz. Although Ortiz was a decent first baseman when he played.
  23. Didn't we have not just a first baseman, but a platoon of Moreland and Pearce on the payroll?
  24. And DD did a brilliant job in 2018 picking up Eovaldi, Pearce and Kinsler at the deadline.
×
×
  • Create New...