Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. It's kind of like the Mafia. They have always been very resourceful and adaptive in devising ways to separate people from their money.
  2. If the umps are cooperating, it's pretty much a done deal now.
  3. The question is how baseball revenues continue to rise when attendance and viewership are apparently dropping. That's why I raised the 'partnerships' thing as a possible explanation.
  4. Where is all the new dough flowing from? Probably from the new 'partnerships' like Nike and DraftKings, isn't it?
  5. Yes, a big miss on my part.
  6. As far as obvious concrete examples go, you can't do any better than the '16 Cubs and the '17 Astros. Both teams somewhat notoriously tanked for a few years, scoring high draft picks that were integral to building championship teams.
  7. It's one of those things that's just obvious. When we talk about the farm, what we're really talking about is being successful at scouting, drafting and developing players.
  8. Not to mention producing Betts, JBJ, Benintendi, Devers, Barnes etc.
  9. You only lose pool money if you exceed the tax threshold AND sign a free agent who has rejected a QO. http://m.mlb.com/glossary/transactions/international-amateur-free-agency-bonus-pool-money
  10. You really think most fans don't care if there are any exciting prospects in the system or not? You must think the average fan is basically an ignoramus, I guess.
  11. I think most fans care about the farm. Even if they don't follow it closely they recognize how important it is. It's always been important.
  12. Not true and not true.
  13. There's no draft penalty unless you go over by $40 million or more.
  14. I don't think any of us expected that by Christmas they would have done virtually nothing.
  15. I do have a suspicion they may have floated the reset goal to see how fans reacted with ticket sales and are now reconsidering.
  16. Yeah the writer is no budgie.
  17. Hmm...that's a pretty good line.
  18. Well, Bloom has his work cut out there, you have to admit. We're going to be subtracting talent, clearly, from an 84-win team whose pitching rotation features health question marks in Sale and Eovaldi.
  19. I do agree that not fielding a competitive team will have an adverse affect. That's what makes it interesting to see exactly what they do.
  20. $100 million over a 3 year period, just to clarify.
  21. It would be very punitive this year though, because it would be the third year over the threshold. Plus they would lose revenue sharing money.
  22. Not by much though. FanGraphs had his total value for 2017-2019 at about 18 mill. Plus that huge 3-run jack in the WS.
  23. It's usually the way it works when teams win championships, though. A lot of stuff goes your way. It doesn't happen two years in a row. So we have no back to back WS winners any more.
  24. Don't be disgusted until something actually happens.
×
×
  • Create New...