Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    Why is Moncada to DH even a conversation right now? That is ridiculous.
  2. User Name
    Can you prove this conclusively?
  3. User Name
    "f***ing stupid" is your realm of expertise, so I will defer to you on that one.
  4. User Name
    This is a completely honest question that I ask to clear confusion on my part: Do you actually watch baseball?
  5. User Name
    It's Price's fault! Aces have to manage the game too!
  6. User Name
    If 7 shutout innings is not excellent work for a starter regardless of pitch count, you either have unrealistic expectations or you're a bumbling fool. I'm betting on a little bit of both with you.
  7. User Name
    He should have started the inning, but he also should have had someone warming as soon as Mike Zunino, he of the career .621 OPS, hit a moonshot off a cookie. Pitchers lose it, it happens. That's why Farrell gets paid to handle these situations with aplomb. He did not last night.
  8. User Name
    Not what I'm referring to. I'm referring to your constant ragging on Price. He was excellent last night, ran out of gas and Farrell got caught napping. But it's all Price's fault because he remembered he's a 4th starter. Where do you even come up with this nonsense?
  9. User Name
    Dear f***ing Lord you're annoying with this BS.
  10. User Name
    I sense some criticism of Farrell in this post. That is wrong, however, since John Farrell is perfect and should not be criticized even when he clearly, absolutely and undeniably f***ed up.
  11. User Name
    Not just not in the right location, but rather "consistently hammered". Both have significantly negative pitch values (in the -3 range)
  12. User Name
    Still very young though.
  13. User Name
    You need some vagisil.
  14. User Name
    Was typing up exactly this.
  15. User Name
    Sometimes you eat the bear (last two games) sometimes the bear eats you (last night).
  16. User Name
    We screamed at you because it's a silly proposition. It still is, and your argument makes little sense. The Benintendi move reeks of desperation, and it's pretty unnecessary.
  17. User Name
    All of these decisions have been both, but more reactionary than anything else.
  18. User Name
    Per his pitch selection charts, he has essentially thrown the same percentage of sliders (17.7%) and changeups (15.5%) the problem, per their pitch values, is that both of those secondary offerings have been terrible.
  19. User Name
    Also, WMB, who SK mentioned in a similar post.
  20. User Name
    Let's be BFFs!
  21. User Name
    But Bradley and Bogaerts were both set back by over-aggressive decisions.
  22. User Name
    Moving Bogaerts to 3B? Promoting and then not allowing JBJ enough time to develop at the MLB level? Panicking with Swihart and moving him to LF?
  23. User Name
    Lineup positions do not operate in a vacuum. It's harder to walk when you're a leadoff hitter because guys will go right at you to keep you off the bases at least once per game, and in those instances, you have to swing and the BABIP Gods have you at their mercy.
  24. User Name
    This is undeniable fact, and the point that really scares me.
  25. User Name
    If he's as good a talent as people think he is, having him regress and lose 3/4 of a season is a big deal. Not from a money or control perspective, but from a "winning ballgames" perspective, which should be goal 1, 1A and 1B.
×
×
  • Create New...