I am not really in disagreement with this. I can live with occasional last place finishes. I was at game 6 in 2013. I told my friend that i was going to soak it all in, because i told him that i expected a 4th place finish in 2014. I was okay with that. What was really bad about their 2014 strategy wasn't the bad finish but the utter failure of breaking in 3 kids into the lineup. They blew up 3 prospects for which they could have received a king's ransom prior to 2014.
What I am saying is that boom or bust strategies are not viable strategies. It' s like being a fan of a bad football team at the end of the season, you find yourself rooting for the team to lose to get the #1 pick. Sometimes you might even get mad at your coach if they win a meaningless game at the end of the season. The players and coaches go out to win and if you have built your team to compete for a playoff spot, you have to have made a lot of bad bets to come in last place. I will distinguish that from rebuilding years where the FO isn't going all out to win but with a gosl of changing over the roster. I get that, and good GMs can still field a competitive team while rebuilding. In 2012, the FO interceded half way through the season to gut the team and rebuild it. 2014 wasn't a tear down and rebuild year IMO. They tried to work 3 new guys into a veteran lineup, but it failed miserably. I just don't think it was the FO strategy to build a wire to wire last place in 2014.