Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70,398

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. a700hitter
    I fixed it for you. I couldn't resist.
  2. a700hitter
    Some people act like it isn't real money if it doesn't count toward the Luxury Tax Threshold.
  3. a700hitter
    You can say it as much as you want and point to whatever statistical studies you can find, but I will give more credence to the players and coaches in the clubhouses.
  4. a700hitter
    Cleveland has a very strong team on paper.
  5. a700hitter
    Unless it doesn't count against the LT threshold...right?
  6. a700hitter
    in every clubhouse , the players know which of their mates has steel in his spine and who will wilt under the pressure. Just because they are all major leaguers doesn't mean the they all handle the pressure. They don't. As long as clutch exists in the clubhouse it exists and is real. Clutch players don't always put up great numbers, because the game is very hard, but the pitchers know who are the toughest outs and batters know which pitchers never give in in tight spots.
  7. a700hitter
    An 8 year run is pretty good for any manger in any town. Plus, Francona didn't lose his job, because Boston is a tough town. He lost his job, because he admittedly lost control of the clubhouse.
  8. a700hitter
    And she is a big ol'horse.
  9. a700hitter
    As you blamed them for being impatient and ruining the team's season?
  10. a700hitter
    And your explanation made no sense in the context of your statement.
  11. a700hitter
    i understand your small sample size position. It is not that difficult to understand. And you could say it with 80% fewer words and posts. What I don't understand is how you can say in one post that Clutch can neither be proved or disprove and then in the next breath categorically deny that it exists. That makes no sense. And then you go into this who riff about how a hit can be clutch but will not let someone characterize the player as clutch. You start to get into the realm of nonsense.
  12. a700hitter
    If they are going to put on someone for fluff who knows little or nothing about the game,they should be either female eye candy (because the audience is overwhelmingly male) or extremely funny. Gary misses the boat on both counts.
  13. a700hitter
    Blah blah blah. After a while it is white noise with all of your caveats and exceptions and confusing context. Sometimes reading your posts is like reading a warning label on an over the counter painkiller. It tells me everything except whether it will make my headache go away.
  14. a700hitter
    Based on what? It was one of the dumbest signings of all time. $72 million and they knew almost nothing about the guy, and he had almost no resume or career worth mentioning. He hadn't played for a year or year and a half Whalen he was signed. Ben would have had a better chance of success if he went on that TV show where people bid in storage lockers.
  15. a700hitter
    Gary is out? What a loss to the broadcast.
  16. a700hitter
    Succinct and clear is not your hallmark. That doesn't make you a bad poster. It is just an accurate evaluation of your posting style Yeah, and I don't think you would get much disagreement with this, but then you will say that it doesn't exist. Not being able to prove something doesn't equate with it not existing. That is clear and succinct.
  17. a700hitter
    Talking out of both sides of your mouth. You agree that clutch can't be proved or disproved, but yet you deny the existence of it. I have no idea what this ^ post means.
  18. a700hitter
    But you did conclude that clutch doesn't exist. That is non "not playing the game."
  19. a700hitter
    Nor can the inverse be proved, but you have seemingly made that conclusion.
  20. a700hitter
    And that evidence has no meaning withing the four walls of the clubhouse.
  21. a700hitter
    But the hometown crowd can put such pressure on a team that it can ruin the team's entire season.
  22. a700hitter
    I disagree.
  23. a700hitter
    I got what you were saying. My response is that this (clutch v. non-clutch) is not an exact science. Let's try not to make so, because it isn't.
  24. a700hitter
    I still think it is racial.
  25. a700hitter
    It would not be enough to make an argument for being clutch.
×
×
  • Create New...