IMO, the trained eye is still better. Stats are good if you don’t have the time to see and evaluate hundreds or thousands of players. They are a necessary tools. It takes time to compile meaningful stats on a player, but a good scout can evaluate a player in a few games, imo.
I enjoy stats and use them all the time as I play lots of Fantasy baseball. When I watch a lot of a player, the stats almost always line up with my evaluations. The less I see a player the likelihood that my opinion lines up with the states decreases.
Where the derision of statheads comes up with me is when they state as fact things like hot streaks don’t exist, that it is a fallacy that good teams find ways to win close games etc. Let’s not even bring up the C word. LOL!
That being said, I would also have to question the usefulness of a stat that indicates that JBJ is a meh outfielder.
My nephew has been to the DR the last 3 Winters. Next winter, I am planning to go with him. I expect to see lots of awesome Baseball and to meet the famous U.N.