Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What do you think?

 

If not for the season ending injury to Gio, who more than likely would not have numbers anywhere near Houck's, would Houck have begun this season as a starter?

Edited by SPLENDIDSPLINTER
Posted
What do you think?

 

If not for the season ending injury to Gio, who more than likely would not have numbers anywhere near Houck's, would Houck have begun this season as a starter?

 

He'd have taken Criswell's slot, for sure, but it's hard to know. They did start him 5th, so that makes it look like he was 5th on the list.

 

Criswell's first start was our 15th game (Pivetta to IL,) so in theory, Houck might have missed 2 starts.

 

Community Moderator
Posted
What do you think?

 

If not for the season ending injury to Gio, who more than likely would not have numbers anywhere near Houck's, would Houck have begun this season as a starter?

 

He had a 0.87 WHIP this Spring Training and hasn't slowed since then. Whitlock pitched well too. Hard to say who they stick with.

Posted
He had a 0.87 WHIP this Spring Training and hasn't slowed since then. Whitlock pitched well too. Hard to say who they stick with.

 

Yes, Whitlock showed he deserved a shot, too.

4 GS and 0-2 ERs allowed in all 4

1.96 ERA

3.30 FIP

 

Pivetta, too.

2 GS before IL

11 IP and 1 ER (8hits, 1 BB, 13K)

0.82 ERA/2.23 FIP

 

Crawford was sub 2.70 until start 9

1.75 ERA/2.81 FIP after start 7

0.42/2.15 after start 4.

 

Bello was our least effective pitcher, but was considered our #1 going into day 1.

 

Community Moderator
Posted
Yeah, the 3 guys fighting for the last spot had the best spring (Kutter, Houck, Whitlock). I know there was talk of a potential 6 man rotation or piggyback. Maybe they would have tried that route until the figured out the best five. Bello to the bullpen probably.
Community Moderator
Posted

@MLBPipeline

The @WhiteSox have recalled their No. 11 prospect, Jonathan Cannon.

 

ChiSox are looking to win this series.

Posted
What do you think?

 

If not for the season ending injury to Gio, who more than likely would not have numbers anywhere near Houck's, would Houck have begun this season as a starter?

 

I think our new CBO screwed up, shelling out $38.5M for Giolito when he could have kept Sale. That bad elbow, however, probably made it possible for Houck to emerge as the Sox ace.

Posted
I think our new CBO screwed up, shelling out $38.5M for Giolito when he could have kept Sale. That bad elbow, however, probably made it possible for Houck to emerge as the Sox ace.

 

Easy, in hindsight.

 

He could have also signed Stroman, Flaherty, Imanaga or Seth Lugo, instead of Gio.

 

I was not a big fan of Gio, but he did look like a better gamble (and more expensive) than the Kluber, Richards, Perez I, Perez II, Wacah and Hill gambles.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
What do you think?

 

If not for the season ending injury to Gio, who more than likely would not have numbers anywhere near Houck's, would Houck have begun this season as a starter?

 

Yes. Maybe Whitlock wouldn’t have.

 

But Giolito-Pivetta-Bello-Houck-Crawford were locks…

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Yeah, the 3 guys fighting for the last spot had the best spring (Kutter, Houck, Whitlock). I know there was talk of a potential 6 man rotation or piggyback. Maybe they would have tried that route until the figured out the best five. Bello to the bullpen probably.

 

They’ve didn’t give Bello that big extension so they could then bury their only young pitcher whose thrown 130 IP in an MLB season into a middle relief role…

Posted
Chicago's alleged best pitcher cannot throw the ball to 1B on two successive throws. You wouldn't see, say Jon Lester make those mistakes.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
So is Garrett Cooper only starting because the starting pitchers in this game are named Garrett and Cooper?
Posted
Does anyone honestly think that any team would take Cooper if offered ? Cannot wait for another position player to return so that dud can be DFA'ed .
Posted
It always starts with a walk and goes downhill from there. Red Sox squander the lead. They will need to hit their way out of this one. Criswell pitching is not highly effective.
Posted
It always starts with a walk and goes downhill from there. Red Sox squander the lead. They will need to hit their way out of this one. Criswell pitching is not highly effective.

 

I think the SOX have been very fortunate to get what they got from Criswell prior to this game.

Posted
Refresh my memory---Weissert is the answer to what question ? Sooner or later the White Sox were going to break their 14 game streak of losing. But why tonight. Crochet must have lost at least his 2 prior times out.
Posted
14K's out of 27 outs. . The bats went empty. Now the Red Sox need to take the final 2 games and move on top some real competition.
Posted
Refresh my memory---Weissert is the answer to what question ? Sooner or later the White Sox were going to break their 14 game streak of losing. But why tonight. Crochet must have lost at least his 2 prior times out.

 

In his last 2 starts prior to tonight, Crochet allowed 3 runs on 8 hits in 12 innings and struck out 19. That got him a record of 0-1 and a no decision.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...