Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Tampa Bay started it, now we're chasing them! Last night our very own TEAMA gave up 3 hits and 1 run against the best team in baseball.

 

Cachin and Wber pitched 1 innings each, and 5 other guys nobody ever heard of, pitched one inning each, I can't wait to see Team B today.

 

I guess eRod will head up the elite Team C. (5 innings, then 2,2,1)

Posted

It seems as though the idea of the opener is catching on and will be here for a while. It does have its advantages, one being that it doesn't give the opposition time to figure out the pitchers.

 

To me, it doesn't seem like it would be something that would be sustainable throughout the season, due to the overuse of the pen, but the Rays have done it rather successfully for 2 years now.

 

If it does continue to catch on, I wonder what that will do to the state of the starting pitchers, particularly in terms of contracts.

 

FTR, I do not like the idea.

Posted
TB has been doing it using a starter as the second guy in. The theory behind it is sound. Teams usually have their best hitters batting 1-5. Having an opener go 1-2 innings then having a guy throw 5 innings allows the actual “starter” to avoid facing the better hitters three times
Posted
TB has been doing it using a starter as the second guy in. The theory behind it is sound. Teams usually have their best hitters batting 1-5. Having an opener go 1-2 innings then having a guy throw 5 innings allows the actual “starter” to avoid facing the better hitters three times

 

I get the idea.

 

Instead of using your best reliever to face whoever is up in the bottom on the ninth, use him when you are guaranteed to see their best hitters...

Posted
It seems as though the idea of the opener is catching on and will be here for a while. It does have its advantages, one being that it doesn't give the opposition time to figure out the pitchers.

 

To me, it doesn't seem like it would be something that would be sustainable throughout the season, due to the overuse of the pen, but the Rays have done it rather successfully for 2 years now.

 

If it does continue to catch on, I wonder what that will do to the state of the starting pitchers, particularly in terms of contracts.

 

FTR, I do not like the idea.

 

Think we'll ever see a team counter the opener strategy by using their worst hitters in the 1-2-3 spots?

Posted
What Cora did yesterday is NOT what TB does. It's not even what the Yanks had been doing. We have been using Cessa, Cortes, Hale, or Adams as the "bulk guy" with the intent that they'd go at least 3 and preferably 5 innings
Posted
TB has been doing it using a starter as the second guy in. The theory behind it is sound. Teams usually have their best hitters batting 1-5. Having an opener go 1-2 innings then having a guy throw 5 innings allows the actual “starter” to avoid facing the better hitters three times

 

Fair point. The Red Sox' approach was more of a bullpen game than an opener game. Either way, whether the 'starter' is the second guy in or the opener is followed by a slew of relievers, the trend seems to be catching on.

 

I get the rationale behind it. I don't like it.

Posted
Think we'll ever see a team counter the opener strategy by using their worst hitters in the 1-2-3 spots?

 

Oh geez...

Posted
I actually like the opener strategy if you’re bringing along a rookie or trying to use a starter that needs to develop a third pitch. They did it masterfully with Chirinos and Yarbrough. Chirinos really blossomed and graduated from needing an opener. Yarbrough the same way. My bet is they use that same strategy going forward with kids who are incomplete but capable of going through an order twice.
Posted
As a matter of fact, I think the Rays have shown the way to develop rookies. I hope we go about this for next year. We are likely to see Garcia and Schmidt provided good health at some point in 2020.
Posted
It seems as though the idea of the opener is catching on and will be here for a while. It does have its advantages, one being that it doesn't give the opposition time to figure out the pitchers.

 

To me, it doesn't seem like it would be something that would be sustainable throughout the season, due to the overuse of the pen, but the Rays have done it rather successfully for 2 years now.

 

If it does continue to catch on, I wonder what that will do to the state of the starting pitchers, particularly in terms of contracts.

 

FTR, I do not like the idea.

I don't either, but it is what it is. 15 2-inning pitchers living together for 3 or 5 hours in a August Arizona bullpen. Banning the slider (just like they did the spit ball) would be a start. Then seam the balls as they did 25 years ago.
Posted
I actually like the opener strategy if you’re bringing along a rookie or trying to use a starter that needs to develop a third pitch. They did it masterfully with Chirinos and Yarbrough. Chirinos really blossomed and graduated from needing an opener. Yarbrough the same way. My bet is they use that same strategy going forward with kids who are incomplete but capable of going through an order twice.

 

Sox should do it with D Hernandez.

Posted

When I see a pitcher start a game throwin 98 and then strijes out he side, Imy first hought is "how long is this guy going to last". It's usually 4 or 5 innings. Even ERod is hutting the 100 pitcg count by the 6th inning.

 

I'm almost sure that the 450 footer homers and the inability of pitchers to throw a complete game are tied together.

Posted
And the Rays are about to lead the Sox by t games

 

We won't come close to passing even 1 team ahead of us.

 

Two was a pipe dream.

Posted
As a matter of fact, I think the Rays have shown the way to develop rookies. I hope we go about this for next year. We are likely to see Garcia and Schmidt provided good health at some point in 2020.

 

IMO, this diminishes the role of the starting pitcher, which is what I don't like. Eventually, what is going to distinguish a starting pitcher over a reliever? We'll just have pitchers.

 

I do see the advantages to it, but I don't like it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...