Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Well here goes nothing....... Offense better come alive today. Fister will need all the help he can get.

 

Even better, maybe the game will be rained out and they can skip Fister.

Posted
Hanley hasn't been good, but RBIs are such a random stat and don't really tell you much. Pujols has been one of the shittiest guys in league this year (-1.7 WAR, .650 OPS, etc) and has 75 RBI.
Posted
Hanley hasn't been good, but RBIs are such a random stat and don't really tell you much. Pujols has been one of the shittiest guys in league this year (-1.7 WAR, .650 OPS, etc) and has 75 RBI.
On a first place team as the cleanup or number 5 hitter, it is garbage.
Posted
On a first place team as the cleanup or number 5 hitter, it is garbage.

 

Khris Bryant bats cleanup and only has 55. Does he suck? Its a random fluke stat.

Posted
On a first place team as the cleanup or number 5 hitter, it is garbage.

 

Devers should hit 4th. Not sure what Farrell is waiting for.

Posted
Khris Bryant bats cleanup and only has 55. Does he suck? Its a random fluke stat.

 

Beyond the stat, Hanley is not even close of what I want fromm a 4th bat.

Posted
Beyond the stat, Hanley is not even close of what I want fromm a 4th bat.

 

Hanley hasnt been good this year. I'm just saying RBI's are not a good stat to determine if a guy is having a good year.

Posted
Hanley hasnt been good this year. I'm just saying RBI's are not a good stat to determine if a guy is having a good year.

 

Don't understand how people who constantly make snide remarks about statistics decide RBI's are OK.

Posted
Don't understand how people who constantly make snide remarks about statistics decide RBI's are OK.

 

I don't get it either. I remember a lot of JD Drew haters on here due to his low RBI totals and him "being a pussy". Good times.

Posted
Don't understand how people who constantly make snide remarks about statistics decide RBI's are OK.
You seriously need to f*** off and start posting about baseball and not making every post about other posters.
Posted (edited)
Hanley hasnt been good this year. I'm just saying RBI's are not a good stat to determine if a guy is having a good year.

 

Well, in this case it makes sense, since this team has one of the best OBP of the majors --especially your 1-3. Hanley should have more RBIs, but he sucks.

 

IMO all stats are useful but you have to take them with a grain of salt.

Edited by iortiz
Posted
Well, in this case it make sense, since this team has one of the best OBP of the majors --especially your 1-3. Hanley should have more RBIs, but he sucks.

 

IMO all stats are useful but you have to take them with a grain of salt.

 

But by that logic, Kris Bryant sucks too. He's played 14 more games than Hanley, hits cleanup in a lineup with high OBP and only has 5 more RBI.

 

If you wanna argue Hanley sucks, cool, go for it. But using such a flawed fluke stat isn't a good way to do it.

 

I'd argue his injury issues, bad defense, below average hitting, lack of on base %, his barely replacement level WAR, etc.

Posted
You seriously need to f*** off and start posting about baseball and not making every post about other posters.

 

 

It's okay a700.

 

Mommy let him wear his big boy pants today.

 

Let him feel his oats.

 

Or the crusty load of s*** in said paints.

Posted
But by that logic, Kris Bryant sucks too. He's played 14 more games than Hanley, hits cleanup in a lineup with high OBP and only has 5 more RBI.

 

I don't think the Cubs has to worried about Bryant.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...