Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Sabathia is throwing 89-91 and topping out at 92 mph again today. This game is far from over.

 

Yup, but still hanging 0s the fat old m' f***er... On the other hand our lefty...

Posted
Lmao Jacko is going to come in here saying "The Yankees are going to turn it around now after this game". Even though they're playing a trash ass Angels team. Somehow Divinity will make it on the site because the Red Sox lost and the Yankees are winning.

 

1 for 1

Posted
You bandwagon ass fan. You're only here when they win, you coward.

 

Naw it's that's just my mojo when I happen to be online the Yankees win and the Red Sox lose. :lol:

Posted
Naw it's that's just my mojo when I happen to be online the Yankees win and the Red Sox lose. :lol:

 

You're the A-Rod of this site. The Yankees lose and you're nowhere to be found or spoken to, and when they win you are suddenly omnipresent and ready to claim responsibility for their fortune. The only difference between the two of you is A-Rod has a modicum of talent at something. :lol:

Posted
Sabathia is throwing 89-91 and topping out at 92 mph again today. This game is far from over.

 

Well this is just false lol. CC's average FB velocity was 92.71 and he topped out at 95.06.

Posted
Anyway, what a crazy 9th inning. Haven't seen a team enjoy that much good fortune over the course of one half inning in a long time. In Mo's last two appearances there have been six balls put in play, none of which were hit remotely hard, yet five resulted in hits.
Posted
Well this is just false lol. CC's average FB velocity was 92.71 and he topped out at 95.06.

 

Not according to pitchf/x he wasn't.

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/pitchfxo.aspx?playerid=404&position=P&pitch=FA

 

I watched about three innings, and according to the gun, he was wasn't throwing harder than 92 mph. Looks like he may have gotten it up to 94 later in the game, but pitchf/x doesn't have him throwing 95 mph.

Posted
Naw it's that's just my mojo when I happen to be online the Yankees win and the Red Sox lose. :lol:

 

What a coincidence, when the Yankees are up 6 runs and you log on, they happen to win. You must be a good luck charm! :lol:

Posted
Not according to pitchf/x he wasn't.

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/pitchfxo.aspx?playerid=404&position=P&pitch=FA

 

I watched about three innings, and according to the gun, he was wasn't throwing harder than 92 mph. Looks like he may have gotten it up to 94 later in the game, but pitchf/x doesn't have him throwing 95 mph.

 

http://www.brooksbaseball.net/pfxVB/pfx.php?month=6&day=16&year=2013&game=gid_2013_06_16_nyamlb_anamlb_1%2F&pitchSel=282332&prevGame=gid_2013_06_16_nyamlb_anamlb_1%2F&prevDate=616

 

Either way, for him, it was a good velocity day, and it translated into good results.

Posted

The gun at Angel Stadium this year is a little faster. Before they used to call it the humble gun by many managers. I saw Robertson hitting 95 a few times, and the case for Weaver hitting above 90, when he is usually under it. Even mo was topping at 94.

 

Brooksbaseball data is provided by the company behind Gameday. It's a free data that any programmer can get the feed to and set up graphs with it.

Posted
What a coincidence, when the Yankees are up 6 runs and you log on, they happen to win. You must be a good luck charm! :lol:

 

Obviously I was joking, hence the :lol: emote.

 

I don't take myself too seriously and nether should you.

Posted
The gun at Angel Stadium this year is a little faster. Before they used to call it the humble gun by many managers. I saw Robertson hitting 95 a few times, and the case for Weaver hitting above 90, when he is usually under it. Even mo was topping at 94.

 

Brooksbaseball data is provided by the company behind Gameday. It's a free data that any programmer can get the feed to and set up graphs with it.

 

I was under the impression that the figures provided by PitchFX don't come from radar guns, but rather camera triangulation. Is that incorrect?

Posted
I was under the impression that the figures provided by PitchFX don't come from radar guns, but rather camera triangulation. Is that incorrect?

 

Yeah it's from the camera.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...