Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
What a nice play by Gonzo. Too bad this game is 99% lost.

 

Watch it-people don't like realism that is expressed in that manner :lol:

  • Replies 350
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
One bad inning in his first start back from TJ surgery from a guy proven to be a solid back of the rotation arm and you're ready to toss him aside to make room for... um... well... uh... Daniel Bard again?

 

proven what ?? are you kidding me ??

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Watch it-people don't like realism that is expressed in that manner :lol:

 

That's not realism though, it's pessimism.

Posted
proven what ?? are you kidding me ??

 

He has a career 4.25 ERA with a 4.26 FIP and a 4.54 xFIP. He's a better than average starting pitcher and as a back of the rotation pitcher is very solid. Aside from one or two teams in any given year, no one has dominant starters at the back end of their rotation.

 

Expecting every starter on the roster to be awesome isn't realistic.

Posted
Watch it-people don't like realism that is expressed in that manner :lol:

 

Predicting an unlikely event that happens to occur does not retroactively make that prediction a good one.

Posted
Still got Cook' date=' since Bard struggled I always thought he is the next option.[/quote']

 

Cook is nowhere near as good a pitcher as Daisuke. Especially at this stage of his career.

Posted
Cook is nowhere near as good a pitcher as Daisuke. Especially at this stage of his career.

 

Where is Cook anyway? Stitches don't take 2 month to heal. But he's not much of anything but a spot starter.

Posted
That's not realism though' date=' it's pessimism.[/quote']

 

When you get behind by four runs against the best pitching team in baseball a loss is highly likely to result. You might debate the 99% figure he used ( I would say our chances are a little higher), but right now, thats realism, not pessimism.

Posted
Predicting an unlikely event that happens to occur does not retroactively make that prediction a good one.

 

I would not say that a loss today is unlikely at all. In fact, its highly likely. Gonzalez is making us look silly at the plate. I wish it weren't so, but wishing doesn't make it so. And its a proactive prediction, not retroactive.

Posted

Bounce back 5th for Dice-K:

 

2B, K, F8, K. But his pitch count is getting up there.

 

Really need the offense to figure Gio out.

Posted
No reason staying up to watch this. Better sleep and save the energy for the Celtic-Heat game.

 

The Celtics are going to win. You will see a tight game that we will pull out in the end. They are a class organization and their players are all team players who are not out for themselves. They give it everything every night. In contrast too.....well....

Posted
Where is Cook anyway? Stitches don't take 2 month to heal. But he's not much of anything but a spot starter.

 

He's sitting in Pawtucket until needed. The FO realizes he's emergency rotation insurance and nothing more. He's just not that good of a pitcher. He strikes no one out and hasn't been able to keep the walks down enough to mitigate that since 2009.

 

When you get behind by four runs against the best pitching team in baseball a loss is highly likely to result. You might debate the 99% figure he used ( I would say our chances are a little higher)' date=' but right now, thats realism, not pessimism.[/quote']

 

I think people are more taking umbrage with your assumption that the Sox would need 7 runs tonight, while Daisuke was still cruising.

Posted
Predicting an unlikely event that happens to occur does not retroactively make that prediction a good one.

 

No need to even try with him. He's insufferable.

 

Nice break for Youk.

Posted
I would not say that a loss today is unlikely at all. In fact' date=' its highly likely. Gonzalez is making us look silly at the plate. I wish it weren't so, but wishing doesn't make it so. And its a proactive prediction, not retroactive.[/quote']

 

I'm talking about your prediction that 7 runs would be necessary.

Posted
He's sitting in Pawtucket until needed. The FO realizes he's emergency rotation insurance and nothing more. He's just not that good of a pitcher. He strikes no one out and hasn't been able to keep the walks down enough to mitigate that since 2009.

 

 

 

I think people are more taking umbrage with your assumption that the Sox would need 7 runs tonight, while Daisuke was still cruising.

 

I revised that to five runs..exaggerating a little, but not much.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Another message to Red Sox RH hitters...this ump knows where the bottom of the strike zone is.
Community Moderator
Posted
The Celtics are going to win. You will see a tight game that we will pull out in the end. They are a class organization and their players are all team players who are not out for themselves. They give it everything every night. In contrast too.....well....

 

There's no evidence that Red Sox players aren't 'giving it everything'.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...