Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Cherrington's Off-Season Grade  

39 members have voted

  1. 1. Cherrington's Off-Season Grade

    • A
      3
    • B+
      3
    • B
      12
    • C+
      7
    • C
      5
    • D+
      2
    • D
      7
    • F
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted
Muggah has made a career about calling out pollyannas' date=' but that's not personal?[/quote']

 

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I still think it's amazing how personal they take everything, but don't mind s***ing on everyone else. And they complain about others' maturity!

 

I'd be psyched if this forum became just about baseball, but it's clear some people don't want it to happen.

From Websters:
Definition of POLLYANNA

: a person characterized by irrepressible optimism and a tendency to find good in everything

Idiot-- the favorite adjective of UN is defined by Websters as:
Definition of IDIOT

1

usually offensive : a person affected with extreme mental retardation

2

: a foolish or stupid person

I'll leave it to you to determine which is more personally insulting.;) Would you be insulted if someone said you were too nice?

Posted
The simple fact that he actively strives to mimic his predecessor in everything from speech patterns to wardrobe should be reason enough for people to understand that he brings nothing new in the way of style or philosophy to the job. And just in case a few folks here need a reminder---the incompetent jackoff he's modeled himself after just got through driving this organization full speed off a cliff.

 

I can understand a hardcore ballwasher feeling optimistic and stretching their grade to a C, but anyone going above that really needs to ask themselves whether or not they legitimately understand the game in 2012.

 

Muggah, some of us, and maybe you were one of them, said from the get-go that the RedSox should have brought in a fresh face from outside with full powers as the new GM----someone not connected with the previous failed regime of Blunder and Coma. Instead they put in a recycle job of a mediocrity that was originally passed over in late 2002 for Epstein. Fair enough to say he was chosen because he was safe, pliable and a good runner for coffee and donuts. They can and do control him and that is why we may be in the toilet this season, though I hope not

 

Ask yourself this question.....If Prune Face suddenly decided to sell the team do you think the new owners would keep Cherries ass the GM? The locks to his office would be changed quickly and his ass would be out on Yawkey Way so fast that his feet would never hit the ground.

Posted
I still think it's amazing how personal they take everything, but don't mind s***ing on everyone else. And they complain about others' maturity!

 

I'd be psyched if this forum became just about baseball, but it's clear some people don't want it to happen.

 

In your post with me you are the one who made in personal not me, just remember that!

Posted
Muggah has made a career about calling out pollyannas' date=' but that's not personal?[/quote']

 

 

It is ok as long as they do it. I will bet all of seabeachfred's garbage that this is exactly what they are thinking

Posted
In your post with me you are the one who made in personal not me' date=' just remember that![/quote']

 

Proves my point. You took an inocuous comment ("out of control") and got upset over it. Congrats!

Posted
A700' date=' you and I both know it's used as a derogatory term on here.[/quote']Of the derogatory terms thrown around here, it is not that bad. I don't know why you flip over it. If someone said that an opinion was unrealistic would you go nuts about it? A pollyanna is someone who is unrealistically optimistic. It's not a terrible insult.
Posted
A700' date=' you and I both know it's used as a derogatory term on here.[/quote']

 

It's another way of calling us fans pink hats just because some of us refuse to agree to their choir

Posted
It's another way of calling us fans pink hats just because some of us refuse to agree to their choir
You, we call Troll. Post something about baseball or get lost.
Posted
Of the derogatory terms thrown around here' date=' it is not that bad. I don't know why you flip over it. If someone said that an opinion was unrealistic would you go nuts about it? A pollyanna is someone who is unrealistically optimistic. It's not a terrible insult.[/quote']

 

So you are admitting that it is an insult, just not as bad right ?

Posted
Proves my point. You took an inocuous comment ("out of control") and got upset over it. Congrats!

 

I found it as derogatory as Polyanna which is innocous whereas calling someone out of control is not. Besides it was a personal attack. I never attacked you personally. If you don't think calling someone out control isn't a personal attack then you are sadly mistaken. Actually in certain situations it can be considered libelous and constitute creating a hostile work environment. Believe me, I know.

Posted
So you are admitting that it is an insult' date=' just not as bad right ?[/quote']Post something about baseball, and I might think about engaging you.:lol:
Posted
You' date=' we call Troll. Post something about baseball or get lost.[/quote']

 

Why are you so upset? I don't know why you're flipping over me being in here

Out of all the posters roaming around here that don't offer anything to baseball I'm the least offensive. :lol:

Posted
Post something about baseball' date=' and I might think about engaging you.:lol:[/quote']

 

I wasn't expecting you to engage me nor am I expecting you to answer the question

Posted
It is ok as long as they do it. I will bet all of seabeachfred's garbage that this is exactly what they are thinking

 

Since I came on the board this afternoon I have been "treated" to one half-ass insult after another that you have hurled at various other posters. What I have not heard is one scintilla of insight about the team or about any of it players or what might be needed for the team to prosper this year. If this is the best you can do why not just read the posts and refrain from answering until you come up with some information or ideas that will contribute to the discussion. Right now all you are in a bore, and a boring one at that.:thumbdown:thumbdown:thumbdown:thumbdown:thumbdown

Posted
Since I came on the board this afternoon I have been "treated" to one half-ass insult after another that you have hurled at various other posters. What I have not heard is one scintilla of insight about the team or about any of it players or what might be needed for the team to prosper this year. If this is the best you can do why not just read the posts and refrain from answering until you come up with some information or ideas that will contribute to the discussion. Right now all you are in a bore' date=' and a boring one at that.:thumbdown:thumbdown:thumbdown:thumbdown:thumbdown[/quote']

 

Fred I think we know this poster from another board but is using a different handle here.

Posted
Why are you so upset? I don't know why you're flipping over me being in here

Out of all the posters roaming around here that don't offer anything to baseball I'm the least offensive. :lol:

You have a dozen posts and you have been talking trash and trolling since your first post. Plenty of people here talk trash, but they also contribute baseball knowledge. Post something about baseball or enjoy your status as a board troll for a short period before you get banned. It's your choice.
Posted
Fred I think we know this poster from another board but is using a different handle here.

 

I'd like to know who think this dork is. Let me know on the other board we post on.

Posted
Of the derogatory terms thrown around here' date=' it is not that bad. I don't know why you flip over it. If someone said that an opinion was unrealistic would you go nuts about it? A pollyanna is someone who is unrealistically optimistic. It's not a terrible insult.[/quote']

 

Flip? Lol.

 

I really don't give 2 shits.

 

It's everyone else that is getting upset. Read this whole post again. The most ridiculous crap is being posted. Calling posters cowards, namby pamby, and all that other garbage. All I say is someone is out of control and all of a sudden I'm the one making things personal. It's rather hillarious.

Posted
LOL...as much as we agree on most things ELK' date=' I have to disagree on this one. Cherington was given nothing to work with. I doubt he was even calling many of the shots. Since there was no choice called "Incomplete", even for the preseason, I had to give him a generous C. You cannot make bricks without straw, as my ancestors once said.[/quote']

 

While that is true, if you put lipstick on a pig it is still a pig.

Posted
I gave him a B. That's kind of a namby-pamby vote, but it's a little early to judge the results of the offseason. As has been said frequently, Cherington wasn't given much financial room to play with. I kind of like all the dumpster pitching acquisitions-something has to come of it, right?

 

Ah hell, I'm a pollyanna, what can I say.

 

Yup, i'm on the same boat. I gave him a B. While Jacko's trying to bust bal ls about letting Papelbon go, i think it was a good move. That would have been a stupid, stupid contract and we got a suitable replacement. Not bringing back Wakefield or Varitek, and doing it without it becoming a sideshow is a plus, as was the Ross signing, and i really like Padilla, and think he will contribute (crazy aside). He built "depth" (what we got is the definition of depth), and the club is in a position where if things break right, they will be successful, and if they don't, one or two in-season moves could fix whatever is ailing them.

 

The Scutaro move was the breaking point for me, and that's why no higher grade was given. It makes no sense.

 

The Ortiz thing has a lot of conjecture and reaching to it. They needed to keep him, or that was a big hole to fill, but they should have gone to battle in arbitration and give him essentially the same salary.

 

If they are really over the salary cap though without the possibility of getting below it mid-season and don't reinforce as needed, my grade changes to a C.

 

I think it's too early to give a grade. Ask me in the third week of August. If pressed to answer what I voted, I say B. I'm with theses guys.

Posted
Flip? Lol.

 

I really don't give 2 shits.

 

It's everyone else that is getting upset. Read this whole post again. The most ridiculous crap is being posted. Calling posters cowards, namby pamby, and all that other garbage. All I say is someone is out of control and all of a sudden I'm the one making things personal. It's rather hillarious.

 

You called me out of control not someone. I found it personal. I am glad you find it funny. I was just making a point. I will drop it. Besides the comment about Ben getting an F for comportment was meant to be tongue in cheek. But as I have said elsewhere folks here are way too serious and don't recognize an ironic comment.

Posted
I think it's too early to give a grade. Ask me in the third week of August. If pressed to answer what I voted' date=' I say B. I'm with theses guys.[/quote']Hey Spud, is that what you told your professors when you had to take a mid-term exam? Let's see what I know at the end of the year.:lol: It's a grade based just on the off season.
Posted
You called me out of control not someone. I found it personal. I am glad you find it funny. I was just making a point. I will drop it. Besides the comment about Ben getting an F for comportment was meant to be tongue in cheek. But as I have said elsewhere folks here are way too serious and don't recognize an ironic comment.

 

You can say that again.

Posted
Flip? Lol.

 

I really don't give 2 shits.

 

It's everyone else that is getting upset. Read this whole post again. The most ridiculous crap is being posted. Calling posters cowards, namby pamby, and all that other garbage. All I say is someone is out of control and all of a sudden I'm the one making things personal. It's rather hillarious.

The whole namby pamby and pollyanna thing in this thread started because Bellhorn04 called himself a namby pamby and a pollyanna.:lol:

 

The only people called cowards were those who voted an A but who did not explain or defend it. An A grade obviously had to be the result of trolling. Kudos to Emmz to copping to her trolling A. The other A trolls are still unidentified.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...