Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
See' date=' here's my real issue with the "now, now, now" mentality, and it's that the people who sport said mentality are the first to turn around and say "well that was a stupid contract" once the player regresses.[/quote']

 

I've learned that arguing with these kinds of people is pointless. If you can't be happy with A-gon, you're not going to be happy.

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I've learned that arguing with these kinds of people is pointless. If you can't be happy with A-gon' date=' you're not going to be happy.[/quote']Are there any Red Sox fans here that are not happy with AGon?
Posted
GoBruins?:D
I thought he was unhappy about not getting him and then he got banned before we got him.

 

Mets Notes: Beltran, Francis

By Tim Dierkes [December 6 at 1:42pm CST]

 

A few Mets notes...

 

* "There is definitely big interest out there" for Carlos Beltran, tweets Newsday's David Lennon. Lennon feels that a healthy Beltran could fetch a nice haul in July.

I would really like to get Beltran.
Posted

With Agon now on board at 1B, Anybody think Josh Willingham is worth Lars and another mid level prospect? Nats are looking at 1B's.

 

Just a thought...

Posted
You are changing the terms of the bet. I said that there is a better chance of Crawford coming to the Sox than Manny coming to the Sox. This is not contingent on salaries. You are the one who is certain about Crawford's cost' date=' not me. Since you are a dead beat, the bet will be, I give you $1,000 if Manny signs with Boston and you leave TalkSox if Crawford signs with the Sox. No salary parameters. No balls.[/quote']

 

Wow, a friendly joking around session turns to me being a dead beat. Forgive me if I don't respond any further on the issue.

Posted
I thought he was unhappy about not getting him and then he got banned before we got him.

 

I would really like to get Beltran.

 

I like Beltran idea. Less $ then Werth and only 1 year. I think if he performed well next season they could possibly extend him and he could fill in at DH and play some OF.

Posted
I like Beltran idea. Less $ then Werth and only 1 year. I think if he performed well next season they could possibly extend him and he could fill in at DH and play some OF.

 

I like the sound of this.

 

I remember reading that Beltran prefers Center, would play Right though if asked. Does that mean Drew would go to Left? Or would Beltran? Wouldn't want to make these millionaires upset now, would we? ;)

Posted
With Agon now on board at 1B, Anybody think Josh Willingham is worth Lars and another mid level prospect? Nats are looking at 1B's.

 

Just a thought...

 

Willingham is going to bring back a lot more than that...

Posted
Willingham is going to bring back a lot more than that...

 

Just like Agon was going to cost the farm right? :rolleyes:

Posted
Wow' date=' a friendly joking around session turns to me being a dead beat. Forgive me if I don't respond any further on the issue.[/quote']You said that you you would not pay on the bet. That makes you a dead beat where I come from. People are talking about Manny like he is a possibility . I make a statement that there is a better chance of us getting Crawford than signing Manny and I set odds on both things and offer to take bets on it. First, you try to change the terms of the bet by making it contingent on Crawford's contract and then you say that you won't pay up. Not paying up makes someone a dead beat, but that's okay, because the bet provides that if someone is a dead beat they leave Talk Sox. That's fair. Still you run from the bet. You are a dead beat with no balls.:lol:
Posted
You said that you you would not pay on the bet. That makes you a dead beat where I come from. People are talking about Manny like he is a possibility . I make a statement that there is a better chance of us getting Crawford than signing Manny and I set odds on both things and offer to take bets on it. First' date=' you try to change the terms of the bet by making it contingent on Crawford's contract and then you say that you won't pay up. Not paying up makes someone a dead beat, but that's okay, because the bet provides that if someone is a dead beat they leave Talk Sox. That's fair. Still you run from the beet. You are a dead beat with no balls.:lol:[/quote']

 

:rolleyes:

Posted
Adrian Beltre's asking price is $85MM over five years, Rosenthal reports. Boston would be interested in re-signing the third baseman if "the market for Beltre collasped," but the plan is to play Kevin Youkilis at third with Gonzalez taking over at first. Rosenthal says the Red Sox aren't considering moving Youkilis to left field to make room for Beltre.
This is interesting.
Posted
Willingham is going to bring back a lot more than that...

 

Well we have a nice stable of midlevel guys to get something done that not too many of us would weep to part with but would benefit teams with weakness in their positions.. Luis Exposito, Che-Hsuan Lin, Yamaico Navarro, Stolmy Pimentel, guys like that. I wouldn't deal Felix Doubront for a triviality because he's an immediate option for the pen but he's expendable in the right deal. Ditto for Ryan Lavarnway who even if he can't stick at C has positioned himself as a very promising 1B/DH prospect because of the bat. We've got some pieces we can deal that we can afford to part with, in other words.

Posted
This is interesting.

Not to me. Youkilis in LF has little appeal to me, not only because he looked pretty lost out there before, but also because I don't know how he'd hold up out there. And while I think Beltre can continue to play well in Fenway, I'd have no interest in seeing if it can hold up for 5 years. It's a total impulse move for 2011 with little consideration of the years beyond.

Posted
The bet is open to all TalKSox members. The thought that the FO would sign Manny is preposterous.

 

So is the thought of giving Crawford 8+/180M+.

Posted
Well we have a nice stable of midlevel guys to get something done that not too many of us would weep to part with but would benefit teams with weakness in their positions.. Luis Exposito' date=' Che-Hsuan Lin, Yamaico Navarro, Stolmy Pimentel, guys like that. I wouldn't deal Felix Doubront for a triviality because he's an immediate option for the pen but he's expendable in the right deal. Ditto for Ryan Lavarnway who even if he can't stick at C has positioned himself as a very promising 1B/DH prospect because of the bat. We've got some pieces we can deal that we can afford to part with, in other words.[/quote']

 

I'm sure the Nats would love a guy that projects to be a 1B/DH :lol:

Posted
So is the thought of giving Crawford 8+/180M+.
Then take the bet. We sign Manny. You win. We sign Crawford. I win. Neither signs. No one wins. Take the bet if you are so sure. I am sure about my side of it.
Posted
The bet is open to all TalKSox members. The thought that the FO would sign Manny is preposterous.

We know, you've been pimping it pretty hard today.

Posted
Not to me. Youkilis in LF has little appeal to me' date=' not only because he looked pretty lost out there before, but also because I don't know how he'd hold up out there. And while I think Beltre can continue to play well in Fenway, I'd have no interest in seeing if it can hold up for 5 years. [b'] It's a total impulse move for 2011 with little consideration of the years beyond.[/b]

 

But that's a700's trademark move:D

Posted
Then take the bet. We sign Manny. You win. We sign Crawford. I win. Neither signs. No one wins. Take the bet if you are so sure. I am sure about my side of it.

 

What's the point? Neither is going to happen. And on the off chance one of us hits the lottery, your out some $ or lose one of the only posters who actually puts up with you enough to respond to you on a regular basis. There is plenty of online gambling if you need a fix.

Posted
Not to me. Youkilis in LF has little appeal to me' date=' not only because he looked pretty lost out there before, but also because I don't know how he'd hold up out there. And while I think Beltre can continue to play well in Fenway, I'd have no interest in seeing if it can hold up for 5 years. It's a total impulse move for 2011 with little consideration of the years beyond.[/quote']

 

In a700's defense, it would only even be necessary in 2011. In 2012 Ortiz would have moved on and you could play a DH/1B/3B rotation.

Posted
Not to me. Youkilis in LF has little appeal to me' date=' not only because he looked pretty lost out there before, but also because I don't know how he'd hold up out there. And while I think Beltre can continue to play well in Fenway, I'd have no interest in seeing if it can hold up for 5 years. It's a total impulse move for 2011 with little consideration of the years beyond.[/quote']I'm not saying thaqt i am in favor of this. If the report is true, I find it interesting that the Red Sox would have an interest in signing Beltre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...