Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
I missed the last inning. Was the third strike on Ortiz a bad pitch on the 3-2 count?

 

If it was a righty hitting, he would have been hit by the pitch.

 

Okay, I exaggerate, but it was truly in the other batter's box.

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

http://www.brooksbaseball.net/pfxVB/numlocation.php?pitchSel=276514&game=gid_2010_05_12_tormlb_bosmlb_1/&batterX=67&innings=yyyyyyyyy&sp_type=1&s_type=3

 

And pitchfx gives the umpires an extra 3.5 inches on each side of the plate. Ortiz didn't actually see a strike the entire at bat. A pitch that's 1.5 feet from the center of home plate is literally 2 inches into the batter's box.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I didn't want to make the game thread because I wouldn't have been on tomorrow.

 

suns, triple-think things before you type them.

Posted
They missed an opportunity to pick up a game on the Yanks in the loss column. Things seem to be coming together a bit for the Sox at home. Let's see how they do on the road where they were horrendous last year.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
They missed an opportunity to pick up a game on the Yanks in the loss column. Things seem to be coming together a bit for the Sox at home. Let's see how they do on the road where they were horrendous last year.

 

Don't bitch. Blame the umps, who were awful throughout but specially in the 9th. You can't win if the ump is striking you out with pitches a foot off the plate.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I didn't get to see any of it today' date=' but blaming the umps is for losers. We should have beat that sorry ass team like a drum.[/quote']

 

Thinking you can beat another team's ace like a drum, then bitching about losing without watching what actually happened is for losers. :harhar:

Old-Timey Member
Posted
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/3135/ortizab.jpg

 

Jesus Christ.

 

a700, look at pitch seven, which is a called strike, and tell me if you can actually win with this type of umpiring.

Posted
a700' date=' look at pitch seven, [b']which is a called strike[/b], and tell me if you can actually win with this type of umpiring.
One pitch should not be the difference.
Posted
One pitch should not be the difference.

If it were one it wouldn't. It was 10? or more. Had you watched the game you would have known that.

 

The Sox were down 3 runs going into the ninth. The atrocious ball/strike calling didn't cost the Sox the game but it made pretty damn tough to stage a comeback. As it was they did manage to score two in the ninth which was quite an achievement, all things considered.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
One pitch should not be the difference.

 

If it were one it wouldn't. It was 10? or more. Had you watched the game you would have known that.
Posted
If it were one it wouldn't. It was 10? or more. Had you watched the game you would have known that.

 

The Sox were down 3 runs going into the ninth. The atrocious ball/strike calling didn't cost the Sox the game but it made pretty damn tough to stage a comeback. As it was they did manage to score two in the ninth which was quite an achievement, all things considered.

 

This. Someone who didn't watch a game really shouldn't try to argue that they know more about what happened in a game than a group of people who actually watched it.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
All of a sudden watching the games means something.:lol:

 

That's why you have Gameday and PitchFx. You don't have to "WATCHH THE GAMEZZZZ!!!!!" per se, but you can at least check out what exactly people are talking about.

Posted
yeah ' date=' that was awfull , so was the check swing call on Beltre[/quote']

 

No s***... how can he not ask for help from first base when both Beltre and the catcher were pointing down the line? Seriously, that half inning is probably one of the single worst examples of MLB umpiring I've seen in the last 25 years. Absolutely horrible.

Posted
It seriously looked like he was trying to set up the Sox lose. That is when an umpire needs to lose his job, for so many reasons.
Posted
Bad umpiring is aggravating, but I lived through the non-interference call on Ed Armbrister in the 1975 World Series, so I don't get that worked up about bad calls unless it can be shown that an ump is crooked. That kind of stuff (i.e., bad umpiring) evens out in the end.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Bad umpiring is aggravating' date=' but I lived through the non-interference call on Ed Armbrister in the 1975 World Series, so I don't get that worked up about bad calls unless it can be shown that an ump is crooked. That kind of stuff (i.e., bad umpiring) evens out in the end.[/quote']

 

But in the meantime, it probably screwed the Sox out of a ballgame, and you're complaining because they lost.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...