Hugh2
-
Posts
3,897 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Hugh2
-
http://www.medhealthdaily.com/when-do-men-stop-growing/ Well depending on what you reference "few cases" turns into "many men" will continue to grow until the are 21 and some 25. considering he's put on an inch the past year I don't think it's highly unrealistic he grows another inch. Regardless he's not as small as he was when he signed and Pedro comparisons (size wise) are no longer valid.
-
Anderson is not probably 5'10 he's about 6'1 and he's put on at least 20 LB's since he's entered the organization.
-
I never said I expected him to grow a lot more. I put on 2 inches after the age of 18, he's already put on at least 1 more since he signed. He still has the capacity to put on some weight to his frame. Standing 6 foot 1 6 foot 2 isn't huge, but it's not exactly like you're standing at 5 foot 10. If you read the updated scouting reports on Anderson Espinoza you'd know that he's put on some size and it's less of an issue with him.
-
If I'm trading a blue chip prospect, I better get a guy more proven back in return. I like Pomeranz, but not for Espinoza.
-
He's about 1-2 inches shorter than him and 20 LB's at 2 years younger. You could easily project Epsinoza to be close to that size in several years when he's done growing and fills out. And his name is Kopech.
-
That's been the story with Espinoza, but he's also been growing and filling out. I believe he's grown 2 inches and put on 20 LB's. At 18 he might not be done growing.
-
Well if thats the theme I hope Pomeranz is the next Max Scherzer who didn't really become a great pitcher until he was traded for by DD and had been in the league for 6-7 years.
-
Bogaerts for only 3 more after his year.
-
Yes his ERA is in the mid 4's because he's tired. He's insanely advanced for his age, he's the same age as a highschooler facing college aged hitters. His arm is young and still building stamina, it's very common for someone like him to fatigue. I'd be willing to bet Espinozas ERA goes even higher and his prospect status and rank doesn't go down one spot by the year end rankings. BOOK IT, also of note he was the youngest player in single A baseball. I'm aware we were'nt getting anyone for Owens or Ball, I never suggested we would so I don't know where that comes from. This team is flush with offense and has more offensive prospects, I would have easily rather of traded Devers+ for the guy.
-
2016 MLB Draft Thread.
Hugh2 replied to Hugh2's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
It's not uncommon for someone in his situation to hold out, it's a business and I'm sure a 17 year old and his family are just listening to his advisor. I wouldn't hold that against him and I'm not going to call him names. If I was in his position, I'd do the same exact thing if I thought I could get more money. He's forgoing going to college and if his arm blows up this could be his once in a lifetime chance at a big payday. Also we don't know when the Sox even started negotiations with him. -
One thing is for sure.....it's a sellers market right now.
-
how is a guy who has never pitched more than 102 innings at the MLB level arguably a #1 pitcher??? How is he going to handle himself in the A.L. east and in a hitters park? How is his stuff going to play up at 150 innings plus? in the playoffs when he's fatigued? How is a guy who has average one of the highest P/PA in baseball going to fair against A.L hitters at Fenway? The guy is good, and I actually advocated for him in the trade thread before anyone else (that I can remember) but it's not like he doesn't come without questions. No true top of the rotation starter has serious questions. I hope I'm wrong as he could just be continuing to take steps forward and excel here, but I can just as easily see him not being more than a #3 #4 starter here. Yes, that still makes this team a lot better right now, but It came at a very steep price.
-
We mine as well trade Moncada for someone to replace Taz now.
-
Casey kelly wasn't as highly regarded as Espinoza. And yes, good for you, you found an example of a prospect who busted, there are many of those. It happens. But I specifically remember people left and right bringing up Lars Anderson when I advocated to never trade away Bogaerts. So yes, Espinoza could never crack a MLB rotation, he could also be a future MLB Cy Young winner. When you bet on young talent, you usually end up winning in the long run.
-
2016 MLB Draft Thread.
Hugh2 replied to Hugh2's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
@jonheyman: red sox, jason groome have a deal. $3.65M pending physical.” Looks like I was right in my prediction that he's going to sign for much less than everyone was predicting. This is good, hopefully they can get some more talent in the system for DD to trade away. I really like Quintana, he's a good talent and it sounded like he really wanted to sign and get his pro career started. -
Exactly, we traded for a guy that has never pitched more than 150 innings a season and never more than 102 at the MLB level (this year) How do we know this guy can even stay healthy and hold down a rotation spot for a full season the next two years. He's literally never done that before, I like Pomeranz and actually advocated trading for him but if I had known Espinoza was the cost I'd easily be ok with not pulling that trigger.
-
I was 1/2 joking. But when his job was on the line and the team was falling apart he held onto Bogaerts, he held onto Betts, and he held onto JBJ. Could you imagine this team today if the Sox traded away 2 out of 3 of those guys? He preserved the system that is part of such a young elite core today.
-
People have every right to like this trade, I get it...you're trading the future away to win now. Nothing wrong with that. But I have every right to hate this trade, I like building a system from within, and developing your own youth. Yes prospects bust, but if 1 out of Espinoza, Groome, and Kopech reach their potential it would easily by miles be worth it and worth more than Pomeranz 10 fold. In 2-4 years from now I can see people in here freaking out because the pitching stinks and trying to figure out how we can trade for some of the best pitchers in baseball. For all we know that could be Espinoza in 2019 2020. Again to each their own, but I'm not 80 years old and need the Sox to win today.
-
Can someone please bring Ben back.
-
What is Pomeranzs track record???
-
the #6 ranked prospect in a system one year is not the same as the #6 prospect another. Owens never had that high of a ceiling, he was always considered more of a higher floor prospect. This is the most stacked top of the sox system in years. All of the top 4 could easily of been the #1 prospect in the Sox system for the majority of the past 20 years.
-
Lets just be thankful the DD got here and Bogaerts, Betts, and JBJ were able to establish themselves as MLBers.
-
That is 100% not hindsight, Iggy was playing well above a level he ever had before with an inflated BABIP and no power. I was calling for him to come down to earth then and he did.
-
Owens was never considered a future ace, I've been following prospects and the Sox prospects for a long time now and the ones who were following around Owens always through around middle of the rotation starter tag on him. Also stating that he'd need to refine his command to reach that level. People who don't follow prospects all that much and looked at his stats said he was a TOTRS, Espinoza has a ceiling that is much higher than Owens is or ever was.
-
Heres a good read on what we just gave up. https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2016/04/14/anderson-espinoza-confident-his-future/PuDSdooJtaVThs7s3HENSJ/story.html