What do we have to lose by giving Devers a shot? Even if it goes well, some here will ultimately claim Sox DID NOT get Devers BEST 6+ years (age 20-26). If we wait couple of more years, then Sox will get his age 22-28 years, presumably a better version of Devers. ********.
Sox need him sooner rather than later because the Sox made a colossal error by signing Sandoval to $95M, 5 year deal. Moreland is a one year rental, keeping the seat warm for someone else, be it Sam Travis or another player. I only bring this up with the thought of platooning Sadoval and Travis in the future.
It's time. This team needs another shot in the arm. YOU CAN'T HAVE THE WORST OPS GUY IN AAA playing in the majors. And if you can accept that, it begs the question why not Devers? He can't do any worse, can he?