notin
-
Posts
54,622 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
53
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by notin
-
I just don’t see the Sox adding a third first baseman. They’d have to unload Hosmer first…
-
The ideal situation is to have a strong farm and spend money to fill the gaps and retain the stars. The worst thing a team can do is just try to fill everything by spending money when these not farm. Cherington had the rare successful spending spree in 2013 largely due to not signing anyone for more than 3 years…
-
Hosmer is under contract for next season…
-
2018 doesn’t happen without the 2011 draft…
-
9/04 Rangers @ SOX 1:35PM ET
notin replied to SPLENDIDSPLINTER's topic in Mike Grace Memorial Game Thread Forum
Yes let’s find the negative in a 4 game sweep and 5 game winning streak!! -
Some of us predicted this years ago. But hey, a lot of people scoff at the whole notion of a cliff. Yet here we are. It turns out players DO get worse as they age, even if you pay them the same. It turns out having no one in AAA or AAA to fill those gaps or trade for someone who can actually is a problem. And yes, Bloom is at the wheel as the team goes over the cliff, but he’s not the one who put on the Sox on this path…
-
True, he was no Jeff Montgomery…
-
And yet he was the greatest Sox reliever of all time…
-
I have no idea about Houck. Could be fine. Could be career-ending. As for Barnes, it would have to be a bad contract swap. Case by case IMO. (If forced to predict, I’d say he’s in Boston in 2023.)
-
Bob Stanley!!!!!!!!!
-
Maybe we’re at that point where he’s just hit his limit? Maybe he is just a one inning pitcher? Maybe the bullpen next year has Houck closing, Whitlock setting up, and Schreiber as the relief ace? And Barnes heading elsewhere?
-
Because of 2 bad outings? Seriously? No one said he’s the next Sale or the next Mariano. Just that he’s been a helluva Rule 5 Draft steal…
-
Also short ST. I’m pretty sure the reduced IP/start was league wide and teams even were allowed expanded rosters for 2 months to accommodate it. But the thing is, expanding the bullpen by 2 pitchers means you use 2 pitchers who normally wouldn’t be on your roster…
-
Absolutely true. Relievers are not all hit or miss pitchers. But all hit or miss pitchers are relievers. Just avoid that second set. I think that myth I’d like to dispel can be rooted in their smaller sample sizes being thrown for a loop with one or two bad outings…
-
f*** no. People are on this forum talking baseball in December when normal people are watching the NBA, taking weekend to go skiing, and making Christmas plans…
-
Actually there easily as many arm problems. Careers just ended, especially prior to Tommy John surgery…
-
“Closers” used to go 2 to 3 innings all the time. They really didn’t become 9th inning specialists until Eckerskey in 1989…
-
As of now, Schreiber is the relief ace. He’s the guy who closed out a shaky Barnes save and the guy who came in the day before with the bases loaded and no one out. That Whitlock gave up 3 runs had nothing to do with “relief ace” as he came in with a 5 run lead. Whitlock is another arm approaching a career high in IP. He’ll have bad outings now and then. And it’s possible these outings are cementing just future in the bullpen…
-
Yeah those Six fans are funny, to be kind. They are so quick to decry the “nerds” running the team and quickly point out each and every mistake as proof, and then right off the successes as just luck or whatever. The reality before Bloom and many others like him took over, this team went 86 years without a title. And now going three is intolerable. And even you tried to defend it with “well they ran into Bob Gibson and Pesky held the ball” and never realized you were exuding 3 or 4 games in over seven decades worth. The reality of the 2022 team is they had a lot of downward-trending contracts that would have derailed any GM. And in times like that, having the team run by a guy who can identify a talent like Whitlock in the Rule 5 draft and building the back end of a rotation with $12mill plus pawning off a couple scrap heap relievers. And the weird part is - PEOLE COMPLAIN ABOUT THOSE PITCHERS! Maybe the disgruntled Sox fans need to be more realistic…
-
I’m just asking questions…
-
How long ago did we sink to the level that people call for the GM to be fired before he finishes three seasons without a World Series ring?
-
Nobody asked if you liked it or even if you care. The question was “would it be easier”? One could easily argue the Sox, by virtue of being in last place in the AL East this year, have the most difficult schedule in MLB…
-
I’ve mentioned Montero as one of three RPs to target this off-season, along with Michael Fulmer and Blake Treinen (assuming he’s healthy). A LHRP might be necessary, too, with Davis and Diekman gone, Strahm leaving, Taylor questionable, and Darwinzon just incapable of throwing strikes. But then the 3-batter-minimum rule has really cut into the importance of the LHRP and you need pitchers whose only skill isn’t being left-handed.. or
-
When was the last time the Sox blew a ninth inning lead? They did it too close to regularly in April and May. They’ve given up ninth inning runs in tie games recently (Schreiber vs NY, Houck vs Cle, Whitlock vs KC for example). But the whole closer thing - ever since the Sox have put Houck in as closer and Schreiber as the relief ace, have they blown a ninth inning lead?
-
Straight up conjecture…
