Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    53,344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. I think you’re losing sight of your point. The argument that Sox ownership is cheap gets convoluted when you repeatedly bring up cheaper or cost equivalent players they could have signed instead.
  2. The story that the Sox were the highest bidder for Scott has been refuted, and MLBTR had the Cubs as the runner up. I don’t think Boston was as competitive as they needed to be there…
  3. I’ve theorized Story was signed just to prove we not Tampa North. But the reality is the Sox commited $147 million to him,,,
  4. I go the other way - they shouldn’t but they will…
  5. Solid argument, but I still think the Sox will sign him…
  6. That feels like a weak reason to not sign him. Especially considering how many good ones are out there…
  7. Sox didn’t sign Thornburg; they traded Travis Shaw for him…
  8. Let’s see if the union steps in…
  9. Maybe they did call him. But they had to speak to his interpreter…
  10. I think we already went down that road. And MLB 100% believed the interpreter went rogue and had access to tens of millions of dollars. Because who doesn’t give complete access of their bank accounts to their interpreter?
  11. Ohtani could place a bet on live TV and murder his bookie instead of paying up, and MLB would look the other way. They changed the rules to accommodate Ohtani. And they’ve been heavily marketing him for a while now. The chances that they expel him for gambling are roughly the same as the chances I flap my arms and fly to the moon…
  12. But how did they miss out on Soto?
  13. It’s a bit hypocritical that MLB nixed deals to Aaron Judge and a few others for trying to circumvent the luxury tax, but allowed that Ohtani contract. Maybe Ohtani will bet on the Dodgers this year and get another translator in trouble…
  14. Up next - Pete Alonso? Someone has to DH when Ohtani pitches.
  15. The Dodger argument of “any team can do what we’re doing” isn’t really true. It’s a safe bet the Pirates TV deal is a tad short of $8.35 billion…
  16. Start by disallowing deferred money on the luxury tax. I don’t get MLB logic. Team: We are signing this 31yo player to an 11 year deal at $30mill per. MLB: No you’re not. That’s a clear attempt to get out of the luxury tax. No team would pay a 42yo player $30mill. Team: Ok then. We are going to restructure it so that we only pay him $5mill per year and defer payments on the rest and avoid the tax altogether while the interest on the deferred payments grows slower than the rate of MLB inflation. MLB: Oh. Ok. That’s different. I don’t see a problem…
  17. So the Sox and Mariners got shut out…
  18. Lose their inexplicable deferment rules and maybe the Dodgers will stop spending at some point. We really shouldn’t have a situation where the Dodgers have more money committed to 2033 than the Pirates have committed today…
  19. you’re not looking solely at his time as the closer. Once he replaced Bednar, he converted 10 of 11 save opportunities. You’re counting blown saves that were hold opportunities…
  20. So you’re saying he wasn’t a bargain basement pickup when he was released by the A’s?
  21. They’re not forced to do it; it’s a choice. Last year, they started Betts at SS over fielding metrics God Miguel Rojas. Why? To put Jason Hayward’s “bat” in the lineup?
  22. Chapman was a closer in 2024, too. He took over once Bednar lost the job…
  23. Even with Dave Robert’s working overtime to take them down from the inside!
  24. What is a “real closer”? And we need a definition that includes Yates and Estevez but not Chapman and Hendriks…
×
×
  • Create New...