Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    54,645
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. One thing some analyticists like John Dewan concluded is using the third spot for your best or one of your best hitters is fine, but have some speed there. Basically what he was getting at was - someone who won’t GIDP. If this is accomplished via speed or extreme flyball tendencies, I don’t think it should matter. I like Dewan’s thoughts better, since dropping the one of the best hitters down 2 spots can cost about 36 plate appearances. On the Sox, I like Devers for the third spot...
  2. But have you ever seen a worse stat to a season from a player who received MVP votes the year before than Jose Ramirez in 2019? His numbers are very Bradley-esque...
  3. Still more than my liking...
  4. You’re right. I don’t buy that. Shaw wasn’t a flop in Boston. The biggest change (besides the home runs from the shorter distance to right-center) was Shaw suddenly started taking more walks. His individual BAs in Boston are almost identical to the ones in Milwaukee. I think it’s more a matter of a player gaining experience, making adjustments, and reaching his peak years. Unless the media was pressuring him to walk less...
  5. Based on the studies/data/analytics, my lineup would be: Bogaerts Betts Devers Martinez Benintendi Chavis Moreland Vazquez Bradley But I don’t think Cora’s lineup is anything stupid...
  6. Well, OPS+ does take ballpark into account. Shaw’s OPS is .812 in that stretch. Andrew Benintendi has an OPS+ of 111 and an OPS of .798 in that same timeframe, if you need a point of reference...
  7. The promotion makes sense. But his BABIP in A-ball is a reason for cautious optimism...
  8. Yes and no. Bottom line is this off-season, DD might be forced to use trades to fill gaps. He certainly has a rep for dealing prospects (and I’m starting to question how much of an illusion Jarran Duran is), and that type of move will certainly come into play. But if the Sox do decide they want to keep Porcello and maybe like Shawaryn, ERod does become a trade candidate, and maybe even a good one. A lot has to fall into place for this to play out, of course...
  9. Crappy teams still win 40% of the time....
  10. I hate that they keep including Jay Groome on these lists. The guy hasn’t thrown a pitch in 2 years and won’t for several more months. Right now, his high ranking seems to be largely based on his performance in high school 3 years ago. To me, it’s very discouraging that only 4 players in the Sox entire farm are deemed more impressive than one who isn’t even playing...
  11. Even including his miserable 2019 season, the man still has a 112 OPS+ since going to Milwaukee...
  12. I could support that. Give Shawaryn a shot and see what he has. Weber has had multiple chances over the years...
  13. Too early? Sorry. I’m referring to his dealing of Travis Shaw. This wouldn’t be new territory for DD. It will obviously depend on what other decisions are made. Like who plays where in the infield and do the Sox need any other players. Do they need someone or go with Devers/Chavis/Bogaerts/Dalbec? Or do they non/tender Bradley? Or possibly the unlikeliest scenario of all where Martinez opts out and DD decides to not pursue bringing him back. But if they need some trade bait, ERod is certainly an option, especially if they bring back Porcello...
  14. Well, he also had some sort of Major and career path at the Academy besides baseball...
  15. Can you see it with a competent affordable starting third baseman?
  16. That’s too many Ryan Weber starts for my liking...
  17. Maybe a quality start, but not a Quality Start...
  18. I disagree. The analytics themselves have changed, but the use of analytics was always there...
  19. Which is more impressive when you factor in that they don’t get to face the Sox bullpen...
  20. The Sox need outfielders?
  21. Then... so far the buzz around Duran’s hitting has been his extremely high BA. But if his BA is not carried by power but instead by an extremely high BABIP, which in turn is inflated by shoddy defense, isn’t this guy an extreme “sell high” candidate? How good will he be against good defenses? I’m not even talking about improved pitching yet, either. Just good defensive players...
  22. Too late. I tweeted it.
  23. I do expect a better BABIP from a LD/GB hitter with speed. But .471? That said, even if it was 100 points lower, he’s still hitting .310...
  24. I guess it depends how much weight the Sox put on his .471 BABIP...
×
×
  • Create New...