Now at the time, harmony was frequently comparing Middlebrooks to Mark Reynolds, which many felt was awful since for some stupid reason, they don’t think Reynolds has had a good career. But if Middlebrooks was comparable to Reynolds, and Chavis is comparable to Middlebrooks, does that mean Chavis should be compared to Reynolds? Might Chavis be looking at a career in which he gets over 6,000 PA, hits 300 HRs and has a career OPS+ of 104?
I’ll take that...