I would disagree that Betts was not the MVP of the Red Sox this past year. But what gets held against him is how he did vs expectations. Bogaerts and Devers greatly exceeded theirs at the plate. Mookie did not, in fact he took a step back. But even wth that regression, his OPS was still only .001 below Devers and .024 less than Bogaerts. Those differences, especially the one with Devers, are largely insignificant. Couple those negligible differences with the defense he brought, and he was easily their most valuable player. (Although, like with hitting, Devers exceeded his expected defensive play while Betts was held to a loftier standard)...