notin

Nomar is the cautionary tale for Betts. Certainly it doesn’t have to end the same way, but let’s not pretend Nomar wasn’t every bit of as special talent as Betts is, and how losing him really didn’t completely derail the team...

I just want them to be competitive. Nothing I hate more than watching the Sox play games in September knowing they’re hopelessly out of it (Yet I still watch.). Give me a reason to be excited through September, and I’ll crown it a successful season....

Maybe Google just thinks you’re boring

Buckner was an elite 1b...

See, this argument falls apart with Konerko, who was a classic case of “can really hit. Where do we play him?” He washed out at catcher, third base, and outfield before finally minimizing the damage he could do by playing 1b. And he’s not alone. Plenty of the 1b throughout MLB history play there because they can hit, but can’t field anywhere else (although some are just left-handed). Not every 1b is going to be a good one, but if JD plays the position for 10 games, how many wins will that actually cost the Sox? Well yes, but is it fair to already disparage JD’s play at 1b as “clunky”? C’mon. Even Jose Offerman could play 1b well...

No but he was also 30 then...

There’s probably a political board somewhere on tt his site

Ages 23-26 Betts: 30.6 fWAR Nomar 27.6 fWAR Not the biggest difference over a 4 year span...

Well, we don't know how the impact is perceived. It's also possible Bloom doesn't want the draft pick penalties...

No movement. It's like the last two offseasons all over again. As Roger Daltrey said, "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss...."

Yes it was. Manfred issued a statement saying the techniques used were unable to determine legal from illegal supplements....

No one said the Sox were innocent. But that doesn't give any validity to random, discredited and unsupported accusations. It's no different than saying "The Yankees were using, so Mariano Rivera was a clear steroid cheat."

That "drop in the bucket" represents more money that the Sox received in the Direct TV deal. The savings will be less than the cost of promoting Rusney Castillo, yet he remains in the minors.

ARod confessed, which was a rarity and I give him credit for it. Giambi didn't confess per se, but he held a very cryptic press conference where he issued apologies after his grand jury testimony. He specifically denied saying what the apologies were for, but given that the testimony was related to steroid abuse, the link was obvious...

But that doesn't mean that random, unsupported or discredited accusations should be given more validity...

I'd go with the latter. Look how he dealt Archer (favorable contract, but a shadow of himself as a pitcher) and quickly improved his team by getting Meadows and Glasnow...

And they would be better positioned to do so if they achieve the goal of resetting, right?

Are Yankee fans the only ones who don't acknowledge that MLB has said those tests were inconclusive, or that there were numerous other issues with the leaked names? Yankee Fan Steroid logic seems to revolve heavily around the uniform the player wore. Ortiz - named on a suspect list for an unnamed substance that might have actually been legal st the time - DEFINTELY GUILTY. Andy Pettitte - named by his supplier in the Mitchell Report, confessed, but said the oft-used "just one time" line that every named player pulled out of his ass - Innocent...

Maybe because that gutting of the Marlins ended in a series of trades that produced 5 straight sub-.500 seasons was a big part in not wanting Dombrowski for this one? Henry did own that team, too...

If the best deal the Sox can get is the 2020 version of the Lynn trade, than by all means keep Betts. That deal was one of the worst Sox trades since WW II. but if they can get even half of what the Diamondbacks got for one year of Goldschmidt, is it a bad idea? How about the next Luke Weaver or Carson Kelly?

Oh I agree.. The only thing the Sox save by keeping Castillo down is the tax on his salary, which is only a few million. (I love how casually I say that, like I have it for pocket change.) If the Sox pare enough salary odd the team, he might even play in the majors this year, although I think the probability is not very high. I just think it might not be 0 anymore...

Yeah that one was pretty bad. Might as well blame Henry for not earning more money so he can afford all these mega contracts...

So should the Red Sox sign Tanner Roark? Also, "Tanner" > "Tanyon" for baseball names...

1. Nice Seinfeld reference. 2. Plenty of teams have won titles with mediocre to bad 1b. Are you saying corner OF is easier? We saw Hanley Ramirez try both positions and was much better at 1b. RF especially is not easier than 1b, considering the throws involved. Saying "all you have to do is hit the cutoff man" is a massive understatement. Plenty of times, outfielders throw directly to bases, including home, and for a RF, the throw to third base is a particularly tough one. There is a reason Betts throw to third was a highlight. And while the plays might be infrequent, tracking down and catching a flyball that is over an outfielder's head is never an easy play, despite how Bradley and Betts make it look. And when those plays dont happen, it is a bad, bad thing all around. There is a reason most inferior fielders get moved to 1b. Taking throws is simply easier than fielding batted balls. The first baseman takes a lot of throws. Everyone else has the overwhelming majority of their plays fielding batted balls. (Note: "Easiest" doesn't always mean "easy.") REally, I would challenge you to name a good team that was made great by a good first baseman's glove. Hernandez won his first title with Ozzie Smith anchoring the infield. While I think Smith was an overrated defensive shortstop, that doesn't change the fact that he was still an outstanding defender (I just don't think he was the best ever at his position, and that he was inferior to Omar Vizquel) and his impact defensively was much greater than that of Hernandez...

You do realize Betts has only one more year, right? Let’s not compare this to what trading away Roger Clemens in 1988 would have been like. But by your logic, keeping Betts for 2020 and letting him walk for a fourth round pick after a season that rests entirely on the health of 3 pitchers coming off injury, and also by not resetting, have positioned the team to struggle to re-sign Betts after 2020 is the smart way to go here. And who said “next to nothing.” Whatever the package is, it will be better than a single fourth round pick (which is your choice)...