Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    53,612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. My wife is legally blind. She uses a product called ZoomText, which magnifies the monitor image (so you only see a small portion of the monitor image at a time). For me, it's very frustrating when it's on to use the computer, but she is very adept at using it, although it might have taken some time. You can also change other viewing functions beyond magnification, including color, cursor size, and focus. Zoomtext also has functions where you can have the website read to you, and gives you a few options for the voice. https://www.zoomtext.com/
  2. Chavis has an OPS of .852 vs LHP. Since he's basically just Moreland's platoon partner at 1b, how is that a bad thing? He's a role player who cannot do much outside his role, but can handle his role well enough. Leave him as a RHH 1B and focus on other positions...
  3. I agree. Trust notin. Barnes = traded. Bogaerts and Martinez stay put. Martinez does not opt out. Book(mark) it...
  4. While this team needs Trevor Bauer, I would be a little surprised if they actually signed him. However, the bargain bin starters IMO this year are probably Kevin Gausman, Alex Wood and Taijuan Walker. Wood and Walker come with obvious risks...
  5. Just specualtion, I'm guessing. I'd be surprised if either got moved.
  6. I don't have much history for the type of free agent Bloom covets, but he did sign a couple this year when he had virtually no budget. The common thread between Peraza and Perez were both were under 30. I think he would look more for short term players 30 or under who can fill holes. Michael Taylor might be one such player who can fill CF and will only be 30 and might be amenable to a 1 year deal (with an option?). Maybe bullpen arms like Keone Kela or Ken Giles, too. But it really depends what kind of deal they would want... I doubt he goes all in for Springer or Ozuna.
  7. It’s got to be a factor if the other team wins one
  8. If he can play good D, he's a welcome addition. He can always bat ninth...
  9. To be fair, Hahn broke up a pretty good team to make those deals. When you deal 3 good players who are all on ridiculously cheap contracts like he did, you damn well better get back some serious quality...
  10. Not until it gets them a title. And it very well might one day...
  11. They didn't have dedicated relievers. Relievers were starters on their off day. They also didn't have DHs. Looking at the 1903 Giants (with Mathewson and McGinnity), that duo appeared in 100 games and started 90 of them. Their B-R page only lists 7 pitchers, and two of them appeared in 2 games or less. Of course, they also only list 13 position players. Were rosters smaller back then?
  12. I do think one of the big problems today is the radar gun. Lucas Giolito had TJ surgery in high school. Probably because he had a 98mph fastball that he threw far too often. Does anyone really need to throw 98mph to get high school hitters out? But those lofty radar gun readings lead to scholarships or signing bonuses, so kids will continue to try to get them...
  13. Would he want to? I have to think one of the perks of being a famous MLB pitcher is no longer having to carry around the jockstraps of guys named "Hippo"...
  14. Carlton and Morris were throwing that hard. The last pitcher to throw 290 IP was Blyleven, who was a soft-tosser with his endless stream of curveballs...
  15. Not even if you added up two of their pitches. But Jamie Moyer had plenty of success soft-tossing the ball into his late 40's..
  16. Escalating salaries is certainly a big factor now, but we really didn't see those take off until around 1990. Since that was also around the time the closer became a limited ninth inning specialist, I couldn't tell you if one factor was bigger than the other...
  17. Not sure how anyone will value him. His K/9 are down and his BB/9 are up, which is probably a bigger factor. His trade value is probably about the same as Workman's, since he has the extra year of control. (Baseballtradevalues.com gives Barnes a surplus trade value of $3.2mill while Workman was worth $2.3mill.)
  18. Looking at his game log, Barnes has given up 9 ER in 11 games. But 8 of them came in three outings, with 6 of those 8 coming against the Yankees. Not ideal, but I think other teams might value him differently than we do on this board. Especially since the number of sellers is probably going to be small with this expanded playoff format...
  19. It only takes one team. And Barnes has a good enough track record. I don't think his 11 IP this year have killed his value completely...
  20. Did you see Greinke throw that 54 mph eephus pitch for a strike the other day? Can't toss the ball much softer than that...
  21. Look at the top ten for 1969. Juan Marichal threw 299 2/3 IP and came in tenth in IP that year. It is odd that after the shortened 1981 season, no on ever topped 300 again. And after 1985, no one ever topped 290. A lot of that might be because were entering the Closer Era of pitcher management, and the closer often came in long before the ninth. inning. The rise of the Closer Strategy, which then lead to the specialized bullpens of today, basically killed the complete game and appears to have done a hatchet job on pitcher IP. And now we are in full blown Death of Starting Pitching, as Tampa has shown the effectiveness of spreading out the IP with their use of openers. (Kansas City tried this a few years back, too, but was not as successful.)
  22. He still throws 95 mph. It just takes on pitching coach who thinks he can fix him and is ignorant of the fact that he hasn't been able to fix all the problem pitchers in his s***** bullpen that are creating the need for Barnes in the first place. While that sounds really specific, it's probably a lot more common than we realize...
  23. 1. I was assuming it would be Anderson, but either one could take over 2B, which has been a weak position for the Sox the past few seasons. 2. Anderson was the only one they drafted and that was two years before they dealt Tatis. Luis Robert was an international free agent from Cuba. Moncada, Kopech (for Sale), Jimenez, Cease (for Quintana) and Giolito (for Eaton) were all acquired via trade....
  24. I can see that. I still think Barnes is the most likely to move, and the Astros, Padres, and Cubs top my guess list of destinations. I am entering full blown prediction mode here...
  25. 1. It was an example, but I can get you a TON more data year by year if you like. Click away. https://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/IP_top_ten.shtml 2. It was AN INCREDIBLE EXAMPLE. Young didn't throw a meager 200 IP. He threw over THREE HUNDRED IP, and often topped 400 IP. In the extremely likely event you do not click away, it might be worth noting you do not see less than 300 IP leading the league routinely until around 1981...
×
×
  • Create New...