Well, LaRussa had an odd take on the late inning defensive 1b replacement. For him, it was Mike Squires. Squires was a weak hitter who often came into games late for Tom Paciorek. Nothing unusual. Except that LaRussa was so god of Squires’ defense, he toyed with the idea of using Mike as a defensive replacement for his 3b, Vance Law. Now first of all, Squires, as you might have guessed, is left-handed. But still, he got in 14 games as a southpaw 3b.
You don’t remember when LaRussa managed the Cardinals and used to bat the pitcher 8th so he could have his two speediest hitters hit back to back? Also he could get more plate appearances for his pitchers! Yeah!
And then also when he used to bat an injured Mark McGwire first in road games so Big Mac could give him a 1-0 lead in the first inning before being replaced, effectively using him as a pinch hitter for the leadoff hitter. Many questions from me. Like, if you’re that confident in him homering, why not save him for an at bat with men on base? Why take away the plate appearance from your actual lead off hitter, whom I think was Placido Polanco? Why cut your bench down by a man before the first inning is over? This whole idea seemed silly.
LaRussa strikes ma as a guy who is constantly in search of some Revolutionary Strategy that he can be remembered for. I don’t think he cares which one we choose....