Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

illinoisredsox

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    8,212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by illinoisredsox

  1. Actually, the answer to notin’s question is yes, they did need 13 games in AA (plus 50 or 60 more).
  2. Who does Puig play in place of?
  3. I heard John Henry has developed an interest in theatrical productions.
  4. Prove it and name the substance.
  5. If they fire him, they have to pay him the remainder of his contract. If he's suspended, they don't. One way or the other, he's not going to be managing the Sox in 2020, so why pay him not to?
  6. One of these times I'd I want to see the penalties go up upon appeal. I had several professors who had a version of that. If you felt you had been wrongly graded on a certain portion of a test, they had no issue looking at it, but they said up front that they would look at the whole exam, not just the part you wanted them to. After all, if one part was mismarked, then other parts could have been as well.
  7. Bradley has the better arm but he doesn’t always control it well, especially to home (throws are often up the line or spiked into the infield). Betts is much more accurate.
  8. They’ll get away with it; the Yankees don’t have to abide by the same rules as the other 29 clubs.
  9. I have no problem with JD trying first base; if it works out, fine, if it doesn’t, oh well. However, one condition; he should never, ever, ever play it with ERod on the mound.
  10. Your mistake was reading anything by Shaughnessy. He defines Spiro Agnew’s nattering nabob of negativism. I really think he is incapable of writing a positive word about anything.
  11. Consider the source. Given this and his 9:50 am post in the Bloom Move Your Assss thread, I think the Ghost would be wise not to drink and post.
  12. Oh, I know that. But it's fun to try and poke him.
  13. They would have that Yankee stench though. And for whatever reason (I think it's the clubhouse drinking water), very few players seem to do well once they leave the Bronx.
  14. Still waiting on that proof that Pedroia fractured the 2017 locker room and ruined the season.
  15. You don't know s***. Show some proof he somehow fractured the locker room of a team that won 93 games and a division title. The incident took place in April 2017. For a fractured team, they sure played pretty well the last 140-145 games of the season. C'mon, man up and show proof, although I know you won't. I'll repeat myself, you don't know jack about anything.
  16. The rules relating to jobs of major league baseball players are not what normal people deal with in their jobs. He has a contract, they STILL HAVE TO PAY HIM and it will still go against the team's overall payroll. There is no roster crunch that will apply once they get to the end of spring training and he's not keeping anyone worth a darn off the 40 man or from being exposed in the Rule V draft. In other words, as moon, notin and several other have said, releasing him accomplishes nothing (other than to soothe your ego).
  17. Boggs would not have done much to help the 1978 team. He was 20, spent the year at AA and although he hit .311. his slugging was only .370. He apparently wasn't that good in the field at that point either; he had 61 appearances in the field spread out among 3B, SS, 2B and the OF and must have DH'd/PH the other 48 games he played in. He really didn't start showing flashes of the hitter he became in the majors until 1981.
  18. My guess is they were looking for a little more power out of a corner infielder; Boggs only hit 9 homers in 6 minor league seasons and until his last year in AAA, there weren't a lot of doubles either (71 total through his first 5 minor league seasons). His last year at AAA, he hit 41. Boggs was a late bloomer. He was a 7th round pick, so it's not like he had star written all over him out of high school. Some guys take longer to figure it out; maybe he just had to mature physically. He was an anomaly in that he hit better in the majors than he did in the minors (although he did hit pretty well for average there as well), When he first came up (1982), he played as much 1B as he did 3B; the Sox had Carney Lansford at 3rd and all he had done was win the batting title his first year with Boston in 1981 (and he still hit .301 in 1982).
  19. Are you seriously obtuse? 1) Releasing him means nothing salarywise. He has a contract; the team has to live up to the terms of the contract and pay him. 2) Offering him a front office position does nothing to change 1). 3) Assuming he can’t play (not exactly a bold prediction), he will go on the 60 day DL sometime during spring training, which means he won’t count against the 40 man.
  20. Good grief, get over it. However much you wish he was "earning" it, multiply that times 1000 for Pedey's level of wish. He got hurt on the field. It wasn't doing something stupid off in the off season. He did everything he could to get back whenever he was hurt. He never sat out with a hangnail the way some guys do. He left it out on the field every time he played and often played when he probably shouldn't have. Save the angst for the Buchholz's of the world.
  21. Evans, Lynn and Rick Miller are obvious picks. Yaz for 4th choice? The only other OFs who played much back then were Juan Beniquez and Bernie Carbo. Of those two I’d have to go with Beniquez. I’m also guessing that Miller and Beniquez won theirs with other teams.
  22. Chacin elected free agency late last week (not that it really matters).
  23. 5GG, if you hit the little button that says Reply With Quote down on the lower right of a post, it will bring put the post you are responding to in a much more readable format than the quotation marks you seem to be using.
  24. I also wouldn't go back too far. Results from the 80s are really not relevant at this point; spending rules have changed, luxury tax, etc. Maybe stick with this century. And our sane Yankee backer above has a good point about losing seasons being taken into account; just off the top of my head it would impact the Astros ranking as they several horrific years early this decade while they were building their current juggernaut. Might tweak the win totals slightly though. 82-80 gets a point while 80-82 loses one, even though they are virtually the same season? Maybe with a 60-65-75-85-95-100 split, or something like it.
×
×
  • Create New...