moonslav59

Deals like Fulmer are fine with me, and he was not a major add. He was signed as depth. Sandoval does not have a guaranteed rotation slot- far from it. We only have 3- Crochet, Gray and Bello. Oviedo might be ahead of Sandoval on the current depth chart based on expectations, but all of our rotation depth after Bello have to earn their slots. As of today, I might order them like this, but none are locked into any slot: 4/5 Oviedo & Sandoval 5/6 Crawford & Harrison 6/7/8/9/10 Dobbins, Tolle, Early 11+ Uberstine, Drohan, Sandlin and maybe Bennett or Mullins with Holobetz as a longshot. I'd much prefer a bit more quality over quantity, but we had 11+ guys last winter and ended up with Newcomb in the opening season rotation and had to trade for DMay and start 2 rookies not in that initial top 11 depth chart in March 2025.

Yes, the deals like Paxton, Hendriks and Sandoval all promised some help in late season 1, but it never happened, and then year 2 was no walk in the park. The Gio signing was different. He was healthy and had a durable history. The year 1 was an unexpected event, but nevertheless, it happened. The other longer deals had opt-outs. It was good to see Chapman extended and given another option year, but they guy is turning 80 soon. We did lock up Crochet, but when the next longterm FA signing happens is in doubt. Yoshida and Story are the only two in over 6 years, and neither was really top dollar.

The sliver of hope, to me was last winter- most notably the Crochet trade, extension and the Bregman signing. Yes, there as the opt outs. There was also the Buehler signing, which sucked, but the money spent was about double the previous winter SP'er signings, except for Gio, who was still on the books when we inked that deal. There was a significant uptick in spending and some changes to the team philosophy on spending, starting with the massive Devers extension- both in years and dollars. That was #1. 2. Bello extended. 3. Rafaela extended. 4. Giolito signed for 2 years NOT 1 (with 3rd year insurance, if he got hurt year 2.) 5. The Crochet trade was the biggest since Sale. 6. The Crochet extension. The largest and longest pitcher deal since Price. 7. The Bregman contract shattered our FA AAV record. 8. The Campbell extension. 9. The Anthony extension. 10. That Chapman signing (then extension.) We did not have 10 moves like this in over 5 years combined (from Nata/Sale deals to the Devers deal.) There is no denying a shift took place. We can talk about why they did it, and if it will continue, but we cannot deny it happened. Some worries happened after these 10 events: 1. We dumped Devers and took on the Hicks deal, while adding little production. 2. Bregman opted out. 3. Giolito opted out. So far, we replaced the Buehler deal with Gray, but we gave up a couple decent prospects to do that. That looks like a plus, but maybe it's offset by replacing Gio with Oviedo, who also cost a couple players to get him. I have serious doubts about 2026 and beyond. I have zero expectations, thanks to these management groups continuing lies and deceptions- or shams, as I like to call it. I'll believe it when I see it. As bad as things got after the Betts trade, the one good thing management did was to build (too slowly) up the 40 man roster depth and farm from top to bottom. The recent shift towards building up the farm pitching has been eye-opening. I can't help but ask, "for what reason?" At this point, we should be looking to fill the 2-3 major gaps we have on the 26 man roster: 3B or 2B (wherever Mayer/Romy do not play) 1B (No, we cannot count on Casas for 2026) SP2 (No, Gray should be our #3 not #2.) If we just fill 2 of these slots with real talent, we can get by without the third, but the problem is, I have serious doubts we even fill one of the three slots with a true impact player. We sit and we wait- just like every offseason since pre 2018.

Before I looked, I expected massive sample size differences and the percent of success to be closer than it was. The drop off, at least in 2025 was profound at 300 PAs. How about 150 PAs cutoff? Only 28 players 34-37 made the cut. 8 at 2.1+ 7 from 1.1 to 2.0 (15 at 1.1+) 54% 22 are above 0 2 at 0 4 in negative (14%) _________________ 30-33 (99 player sample size is over 3 x more than 34-37 yr olds) 41 at 2.1 or more 15 at 1.1 to 2.0 (56/99 are at 1.1 or more) 59% does not blow 34-37 away, but there are some whoppingly big fWARs in this group) 81 are plus 1 at 0 17 are negative (17% shows more also suck, as a percentage) __________________ 26-29 has a 146 players w 150+ PAs (50% more than 30-33 and over 5 X the oldest group!) 43 are at 2.1 or more 33 from 1.1 to 2.0 (76/146 at 1.1 or more) 52%, which is lower than both older groups, 114 at 0.1 or more 5 at 0 27 are negative (18% is worse than the older groups) ____________________________ I'm not sure what this all means. There were less older players than I thought. The ones that stick around suck less than younger players, but they don't reach the highs either. As a percent in each group by fWAR, there are not massive differentials by numbers, but if you add up all the WAR values and divided by how many in the group, I think we'd see stark differences. I was surprised the 30-33 look better than 26-29.

I doubt we only sign 1 year guys, this winter. We signed Gio and Hendriks to super long 2 year deals (LOL) before 2024, and signed Sandoval, last winter. Now, when we need top talent, we will back off on 2 year deals? How about a one year with team option with a buyout?

I see that point, but I also see how our pitching depth is a goldmine for trading purposes, especially to teams that can't afford to pay for FA pitching but think they are a decent SP'er or two away from having a shot. While I'd really like a solid #2 to push Gray to 3 and Bello to 4, our top need is a big bat. (I'd say two, but I keep getting shouted down.) Let AZ pay Bregman. We can trade an OF'er & a few pitchers (not named Tolle or Early) for Marte. Then, sign Suarez or Okamoto, or take a flyer on FA pitcher like Imai or be bold and get Ranger Suarez. Okay- okay, I'm dreaming, again. Pinch me.

If those rankings are correct, the need for offense is legit.

Good points. I'm not sure why the 2.3 cut-off, but I'll roll with it. I used fangraphs 2025 and 300+ PAs. 4 out of the 20 player sample size had an fWAR of 2.3 or more. 30-33 year olds: 39 out of 77 26-29: 39/101 22-25: 31/73 All way higher numbers and percentages. I'll do a deeper dive, later.

Kind of a quiet winter, so far. Plenty of moves- just not many big ones... Sonny Gray & $10M for Fitts & Clarke Johan Oviedo, Tyler Samaniego & Adonys Guzman for J Garcia & Travieso Ryan Watson (Rule5) for Riemer & lost J Paez to Rule 5 selection Jake Bennett for Perales Tristan Gray for Guerrero Ronny Hernandez for Murphy Isaiah Jackson for Grissom Braiden Ward for Bernardino Luke Heyman for Hoppe

I'm not trying to get one that they actually do, so keep on trying to figure out other posters' motivations. I did get the Cody Ross signing right way back in the day! LOL!

Assuming these SP'ers will get some starts at the MLB level, we are still loaded up in the minors: Crochet, Gray, Bello Crawford, Oviedo, Sandoval Harrison, Dobbins, Tolle, Early _______________________ Uberstine, Drohan, Sandlin, Mullins, Bennett Holobetz, Rogers, Wehunt, Rivera, Dean Valera, Fajardo, Witherspoon, Phillips, Eyanson, Aita Tygart, Neely, Ehrlicher, J Bello, M Patton, L Finley D Brown, B Margan, Y Ruiz, M Bido, Y Chirino & more

He did get to "dump" Contreras in my scenario.

He would not pass through waivers. Maybe HOU has no want for DHam and might take Sogard, instead or nobody else. It's just conjecture. BTW, 2024-2025 3.6 bWAR 1.8 fWAR (31st among 2Bmen with 500+ PAs) Not bad for a sub.

MLB.com projects the Sox rotation as 2nd best in MLB and the pen 5th best. https://www.mlb.com/news/red-sox-position-breakdown-as-of-december-2025 If the season started today, they have Ceddanne at 2B, Mayer at 3B and the rest as expected. C: 23rd ranked 1B: 17th 2B: T 14th SS: 27th 3B: 23rd (Pretty sad infield) LF: T6th CF: 8th RF: 7th (Pretty nice OF) DH 12th

Not sure why he fascinates you so much, but HOU is giving us two IF'ers for 1 and it's a 2 for 2 forty man roster swap.

How about K Campbell & DHam to HOU for Paredes & Brice Mathews?

B Lowe & Mangum to PIT Mike Borrows to HOU Jacob Melton & A Brito to TBR

To BOS: Paredes 12 To HOU: Rafaela 36, Hicks -18 ______________________ To BOS: Hunter Greene 82 To CIN: Mayer 55, Campbell 19 & Harrison 7 ____________________ To BOS: Contreras -14 To STL: Yoshida -26 & Casas 18

To BOS: Lodolo 31, Donovan 33 & Contreras -18 To CIN: Rafaela 36 To StL: Crawford 22, Casas 18, Masa -18

From what I can gather on BTV as a nonmember, this might work... To BOS: Donovan 33, Bubic 16 & Pasquantino 13 (+$4M from STL) To KCR: Duran 46 & Contreras -14 (+$4m from BOS) To STL: Hicks -18, Crawford 22 & Casas 18

Sell out cellar dweller sellers.

I think KMarte has 2-3 really good years in him and then 2-3 pretty good ones to end his contract. Just a guess. I think he is light years better than any remaining option for boosting the offense. He also fills a decade long hole at 2B- once and for all. I think Suarez gets 3 years minimum, and I'd rather give $65M/3 than than $48M/2, especially since he probably wont take 2 years. Getting both would mean we could trade Mayer for a really good pitcher (Ryan?) or play Suarez at 1B and mayer at 3B. We could keep Duran in the line-up. We could even go overboard and trade Rafaela for Lodolo. Crochet, Ryan, Lodolo, Gray, Bello 1. L Anthony CF 2. S KMarte 2B 3. L Duran LF 4. R Suarez 3B (1B maybe) 5. L Casas 1B/R Romy 1B 6. R Story SS 7. L Abreu RF 8. L Masa DH/R Romy DH 9. R Narvaez C

I'm not sure why you are so low on K Marte. The guy is aging well, unlike Bregman and others. Bregman is almost 32: OPS+ 132 at age 28 122 at 29 116 at 30 128 at 31 (2/3 of a season) 121 OPS+ ages 29-31 ____________________ KMarte just turned 32 105 at 28 127 at 29 154 at 30 145 at age 31 (141 from 29-31) ____________________ Bichette 114 OPS+ last 3 years at ages 25-27 (-27 from KM) Alonso was 130 in his last 3 years (28-30) -11 Schwarber was 135 ages 30-32 (-6 from KM) ___________________ There is no better option available.

LOL. Are you mocking me?

So, Hicks for the fixed up Brasier?