That $9-10M is the reason the Nats cut ties.
It seems like we have been forever trying to guess what level of spending JH will approve, each winter, and if we predict he will allow us to spend up to the first tax line, without going over, then that $9-10M is very significant and would downscale our options.
We have Bregman returning or not as a major financial choice.
We have to bring Chapman back or pay bigly for another one.
We need a solid SP'er, even if Giolito returns.
We need pen help and maybe 2B help, along with the Lowe choice at 1B.
One obvious decision could be made to solve one of the these problems: trade from our OF excess for a relatively lower cost solution, but do we have the nerve to make two major trades, like this, to fill two major roles? Will making two trades put too much strain on our depth, or force us to count on Jh Garcia, Campbell and or Mayer to win FT roles
We also have some recent extensions that will kick in. I agree with all of them, but nevertheless, we added 2026 cost that was not on the books, until recently:
$28.3M Crochet
$16.3M Anthony
$9.2M Bello
$7.5M Campbell
$6.3M Rafaela
The tax hit on Hicks is $10.3M and Duran has an $8M option or arb.
Gio's 140 IP option trigger or not could add a lot of salary or create another rotation hole.
Before the year started, and even more so, after the Devers salary dump trade, our budget outlook was pretty good. Now, it's kinda tight.
OPEN UP THE WALLET JH!!!! Spending to the 2nd line should be enough. Spending up to the first line might not be, unless we make two big trades that include some highly ranked prospects and young core players like Duran or Abreu plus maybe Campbell, Arias, Tolle or several prospects ranked 3-12, mostly pitchers.