I'm not missing that point. That point was based on him playing well in April and amassing enough PAs to "be on pace" to vest. That may be a point they use in a possible grievance, but HRam was playing himself into a benching and a no vest. 18 crappy games is significant enough to warrant a benching or DFA,
Asking a team to bench a guy that was slated to be a back-up DH just so a grievance will not be filed is ludicrous. Moreland's hot start was a factor, because it basically relegated HRam to a DH role that was taken by JD. There literally was no place to play him, so the DFA was well founded and can be supported with a lot of evidence.
Yes, HRam has some points on his side, duely noted, but IMO, he's not even close to winning a grievance. I believe that so firmly, I doubt one will even be filed.