Jump to content
The MLB trade deadline is coming, take a look at our top trade candidates list, now up to 60 names! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    105,559

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    136

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    I didn't mention that, but I'd say the core of young cost-controlled players is less than when Ben and DD took over. Devers, DHern and Bogey at a reasonable cost is about it. I'm not counting guys like Betts & ERod who have 1-2 years left and are no longer young or a "core" for the extended future.
  2. moonslav59
    The credit taken away for 2013 is equal to that gained by 2018. DD did not leave anything for the next guy but high debts and a near barren farm. Plus, Ben left DD a better farm than he inherited, although the young core of non prospects was pretty damn awesome.
  3. moonslav59
    Obviously UZR/150 is not part of WAR since, as you pointed out, many of the players with better UZR's than JBJ have worse DWARs, although DWAR is a cumulative metric, where as UZR/150 is per game. I'd rather have JBJ than anyone on that list. My point was just about equal or near equal defense available at a small fraction of the cost of JBJ. (I doubt Dyson gets $5M. He's old.) I'm for keeping us strong up the middle on defense. I feel some sacrifices have to be made, and JBJ's offense is not something I'm going to cry about losing, even if he ends up better than everyone on the list.
  4. moonslav59
    I'm very optimistic with this kid, but let's not mess him up by rushing him or keeping him down too long. I trust the Sox to know when the right time is. I don't think we've ruined any pitchers by doing either one wrongly.
  5. moonslav59
    IMO, Chavis does not hit well enough to play 1B. He may not field well enough to play 2B. My guess is we let the whole mix fight it out and maybe add a cheap slugging 1Bman who might platoon.
  6. moonslav59
    I guess it's nice, but these awards are a sham.
  7. moonslav59
    I hope he promotes them when they are ready- kind of like we've been doing for a long time. I've never felt like we've left guys in the minors too long or too short. I don't think it's been a problem, and I doubt it will become one. Ward is not ML ready right now, but he may be at some point soon. I hope he is, but I don't want us to rush him. If 2020 is truly a rebuild year, that makes waiting until 2021 easier.
  8. moonslav59
    UZR/150 is not WAR, and I did not mean this to prove these guys are better than JBJ. I meant it to show there are several players available that are close to the same or maybe even better than JBJ might be next year. Like you, I want superior defense in CF. I just don'tthink it has to be or should be JBJ.
  9. moonslav59
    Well, he might have trade value only if we kick in some cash.
  10. moonslav59
    To me, it hardly matters. I think we trade him, if he stays, and we won't get much for him, so it's not such a big deal.
  11. moonslav59
    If Bloom can do what he did in TB with the money saved, and we get some key pieces by trading Betts (and maybe others), and then we bring Betts back, the rebuild might just be one year!
  12. moonslav59
    If we plan on losing JBJ and one or more from Price, Eovaldi and Betts, then we won't have to worry about staying under the luxury tax line. Anything we can get for JD, even by pitching in $10M might still be better than him opting out. Everyone says it all starts with JD, which in terms of time, it does, but the plans for other players may be more important and may effect what we do with JD, if he doesn't opt out. The no QO idea looks good. We only get a pick after the 4th round anyway.
  13. moonslav59
    You guys are making the same mistakes we did. WaAAAAAYYYYYY Tooooooo Much for a Closer!
  14. moonslav59
    Stanton's views on who he might want to play for might have changed. He may also have realized he hates it in NY. (I have no evidence this is true, but never say never.)
  15. moonslav59
    Imagine this team with no Betts, JD, Price, Eovaldi & JBJ. That's a lot of money freed up to spend elsewhere. Maybe some could be used to bring Betts back and still have what we got by trading him.
  16. moonslav59
    Is that sarcasm?
  17. moonslav59
    "Earth to notin" = calling an opinion (not the person) "idiotic."
  18. moonslav59
    That alone, makes it worth it. His money dropping off may help us keep or bring back Betts.
  19. moonslav59
    True, but Melancon became a damn good pitcher for a while, afterwards.
  20. moonslav59
    Yes, that was one of his first moves. My bad.
  21. moonslav59
    Better than Eovaldi & Price, but the main thing is the AVV savings is $7M in 2020, but isn't it much less year 2 & 3?
  22. moonslav59
    Does anybody remember who the poster was that swore up and down we'd regret it, if Price opted out?
  23. moonslav59
    Lets do both in one heartbeat!
  24. moonslav59
    No, but using the money to upgrade the rotation and pen might outweigh the loss at DH. If JD ends up declining quickly or is on the DL a lot, then seeing him go might end up working out for us. It's a tough call. Certainly, our line up is much better with a healthy, non declining JD in it.
  25. moonslav59
    Stephen Fife for Bedard.
×
×
  • Create New...