Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    107,366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Ummm, not trading Betts means we have Price's full $32M contract still on the books. That's over $45M to make up. Richards is $10M of that.
  2. The point is that yes, we can afford him, but when you also have Price at $32M, Sale at $25M, JD at $22M, Bogey at $20M and Eovaldi at $17M, the rest of your roster is going to be full of players barely above replacement level, unless you have a strong, deep and balanced farm. Let's not for get the David Price part of that deal. It was Crawfordesque.
  3. Oh, and I forgot to add the $16M saved by Price. Basically, every dollar we spent, this winter is still less than Betts + Price's half share.
  4. We can argue about spending limits or no spending limits, but mix and match to reach the $30M Betts has for an AVV: Betts $30M or Verdugo $0.65M plus mix n match... $10M Richards $9M Ottavino $7M Hernandez $5M Perez $3M Marwin $3M Renfroe $2.1M Andriese $1.5M Sawamura Pick the worst bunch to reach $30M. Pick the best. Either way, who plays in the slots left vacant by the ones you pick? You can pray Houck, Duran, Bazardo and Chavis with no Verdugo could join Betts to make us a better team, but I'm not seeing it.
  5. Updated Rotation Numbers: 3-0 2.81 Pivetta 4-0 3.52 ERod 3-2 3.77 Eovaldi 1-2 4.94 Richards 0-1 5.71 Perez IP H - BB - K 28.2 28- 5- 27 Eovaldi 25.2 15-17-25 Pivetta 23.2 25-13-22 Richards 23.0 18- 2 -26 ERod 17.1 20- 9 -15 Perez Team Record in Starts 4-0 ERod (45-12 from 2018-2019) 4-1 Pivetta 3-1 Perez 3-2 Eovaldi 2-3 Richards The team has gone 49-12 in ERod's last 61 starts with the Sox! .803 winning %
  6. Pivetta has always had nasty stuff. His issue has always been the BBs. I had high hopes for him, this year and even projected him to do better than Perez (no biggie) and the same as Eovaldi. I also thought Kike would play more CF than 2B. My list of wrong projections is much longer.
  7. Sure is! One could also exclaim, "Since when has Barnes been a lights out closer?"
  8. This isn't "stretching out" Whitlock, but in Cora I trust.
  9. And we hit the ball hard while not swinging for HRs every AB.
  10. The 6th inning has been his downfall. Innings 1-5: 3 runs allowed 6th inning: 5 runs allowed OPS Against by innings: .520 1st .500 2nd .500 3rd .641 4th .450 5th 1.125 6th Times facing a batter: .493 1st .548 2nd 1.203 3rd
  11. The idea would be to PH Renfroe for Cordero or Cordero for Renfroe after a pitching change, but a manager might be reluctant with a 2 man bench. (I don't count Plawecki.) Renfroe still has a massive split differential, while Cordero has yet to show his normal wide L-R split. For the same reason the 14th pitcher offers more options rather than filling a need, so does having a 3 man bench vs a 2 man bench. I might offer the argument that there is actual need for the extra bench guy, either as a PH'er, a defensive replacement or just to offer flexibility or an emergency back-up. The horse has been beaten enough. It's not a major issue that affects the team that much either way.
  12. Gonzalez>Arroyo? (I'm not complaining.) Good to see no Renfroe or Cordero.
×
×
  • Create New...