Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    104,308

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    129

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    We dropped the ball replacing Devers at the deadline. The ball is still on the ground. The Bregman loss only highlights the need to add some serious O.
  2. moonslav59
    Me, too. I consider it bottom 3rd in 2024.
  3. moonslav59
    Great points. I still think need a big O add.
  4. moonslav59
    I have wanted KMarte over Breggie and Bichette due to the "quality" position all along, but I do see the downside of losing Tolle or Early plus others. I'd do a trade, now. That being said, I also think adding Gray, Contreras, Oviedo, Suarez and a RP is enough quality to make us clearly better than 2025. Maybe not enough to get us to top 6, but very close. No way do I chose Bichette as the guy to go large and long on, despite his age. I don't care about 250Ks, if the guy has an OPS+ of 120. (Suarez was 126 in 2015.) Paredes was 123. Vientos was 97 but 134 in '24. Donovan was 119 in '25, and no, he won't take a top 4 prospect to get.
  5. moonslav59
    I could care less what others think. The Sox 26, 40 and system as a while is way better now than a few years ago. Our longer term outlook looks as good as anytime since 2017. I guess that counts for nothing, because we failed to grossly overpay Breggie.
  6. moonslav59
    With Casas, I might add Mullins or even Sandlin. I like Romy. I might add Cespedes, Bleis or Castro with him- all prospects I have written off. Maybe we overpay to get him. Again, I'm not high on Vientos, at all. I'm just pointing out a minor move we could do to get us close to being better than 2025. (I also mentioned adding a decent RP.)
  7. moonslav59
    Cotillo reports the Sox offered $165M/5, so they did go 5. That is a fair to overpay offer, anyway you look at it.
  8. moonslav59
    Of course, but many mentioned $200M/6, and we are not sure Bogey would have taken that, anyway. It might not turn out to be be bad, but nobody is crying about losing him, anymore. We may view the loss of Breggie in a similar light, 4-5 years from now. Remember the uproar after losing Ellsbury? And to the Yanks! Cricketts...
  9. moonslav59
    You really feel the same about Story as last winter? Wow. Even if you view the injury risk as the same, nobody thought he'd regain that production level.
  10. moonslav59
    Which is very near even to 2025. Add Suarez (projected 2.3 fWAR) and maybe a pitcher and we'll be projected at 89 wins or more.
  11. moonslav59
    I'm not sure why you value post all star break so highly, but that's your choice. Why not apply the post allstar numbers to Houck? (4.23 ERA/4.53 FIP) How about Bello? 3.43 game 16> '25 and 3.83 post gm 16 in '24? You are selectively using second half stats. Narvaez ended the season doing better than the 2025 Sox catcher numbers. Okay with Gio>Oviedo, but Crawford was worse in '24 than '23. (ERA+ 113>95)
  12. moonslav59
    Sorry. I confused you with Utah's post. My bad. For all the talk about how Narvaez ended 2025, his OPS after mid AUG was still higher than the 2025 catcher OPS of .723. While Wong sucked, his OPS before 7/30 was .392 and after was .635. His defense looked way better in '25 than '24, and Narvaez was very good on D.
  13. moonslav59
    Your methodology was to view how we saw positions last winter vs this winter. How can you possibly view Narvaez as not better? Based on a drop off from mid July to mid August. He was at .719 on AUG 28th and .726 to end the season. I 100% see our catcher position in a way better light than I did in winter 2025. Most of us saw the underlining data on Wong and saw his 2024 offense as being unsustainable. We also saw his defense as highly suspect. Now his defense looks way better, and his offense worse, but he's the back up. Narvaez looks very good on D and better than Wong.
  14. moonslav59
    I'm not thrilled with the idea of praying for plus health and significant upticks from our pre-prime and peak prime players, but it's not something outlandish. I'm no fan of Vientos or Donovan, but if we could get one without losing Duran, and or trade Duran for Lodolo, I think we'd have a pretty decent shot at being significantly better in 2026. Add Suarez and Lodolo/Bubic/Peralta or even Keller/Singer/Gore/Alcantara/Lopez/Castillo and maybe we can reach top 6 projections. Fangraph's has us ranked 9th in projected fWAR, now... 0.2 from #8 PHI 0.3 from BAL (I think we are already better than BAL, but the Cubs might have passed us, so call this even) 0.5 from #6 NYM 2.1 from #5 SEA Getting to #5 will be hard, especially if SEA or NYY add someone this winter.
  15. moonslav59
    I think we see Anthony leading off. Maybe Duran 3rd and Suarez 4th. Contreras has a nice OBP, so maybe we bat him in the key #2 slot. 1. L Anthony LF 2. R Contreras 1B/C 3. L Duran DH/LF/CF 4. R Suarez 3B/1B 5. L Abreu RF (full time) 6. R Story SS 7. L Mayer 2B/3B & R Romy 2B/1B (platoon) 8. R Narvaez C or L Masa DH (if Contreras is at C and Duran in LF or on bench v L) 9. R Rafaela CF
  16. moonslav59
    Speaking of the Yanks. They may not sign Bellinger, despite a reported $30M AAV offer. Rodon is expected to start the season on the IL. He's 33. Cole is coming off a major injury and hasn't had a great season since 2023. He's 35 and some are writing off the 36 year old Gray, who has actually pitched well from 2024-2025. They have some good young pitchers and players, but better than ours? Ages in 2025: 22 Dominguez 24 Schlitter & Volpe 25 Wells 26 Rice & Warren 27 Chisholm & Gil Red Sox: 21 Anthony 22 Tolle & Mayer 23 Early, Harrison & Campbell 24 Rafaela 25 Casas 26 Crochet, Bello, Abreu & Narvaez 27 Slaten If you factor in age progression production, we could see some significant gains on NYY.
  17. moonslav59
    How are we possible a push at the 6 slots you said we were, at the same time last year? I'm using your methodology but correctly.... C: Better 1B: Better 2B: Push (ROMY>KC, but DHam'25>DHam '26)) SS: Better 3B: WAY WORSE LF: Better CF: Better RF: Push DH: WAY WORSE SP1: WAY BETTER SP2: Push or better as Houck was a concern SP3: BETTER (Bello looks better now than before '25) SP4-8: Push Closer: WAY BETTER Set-up 1: WAY BETTER (Whitlock was huge question last winter) Set-up 2: Push (Slaten) Pen depth: WORSE 9 better 9 push 3 worse (2 way worse)
  18. moonslav59
    Anyone wish we signed Bogey to $175M/5 back in spring 2022? (2023-2027) We never hear about him, anymore. It used to be "Betts and Bogey...."
  19. moonslav59
    Why won't the fans, if he gets hurt like Story or underperforms like Masa?
  20. moonslav59
    They key to JH seems to be more about the years than the AAV, so maybe we can win the Suarez sweepstakes. If he gets 3 years, maybe not. We haven't signed a FA player to 3 years or more since Masas and Story. Before that it was re-signing Nate (2019.) That's 2 players in 7 year- neither one being a mega AAV. The last real large and long FA signing was Price back in 2016- fully 10 YEARS AGO!!!
  21. moonslav59
    I would not have come close to matching the Cubs, but if a player being all about money is the reason to not sign a FA, be prepared to never sign any,
  22. moonslav59
    Devin Williams? Full throttle!!!!
  23. moonslav59
    I thought it was all about winning and making the playoffs to you. No Breggie- no playoffs in 2025. You doubt that? You wish we did not sign him and miss the playoffs? I love it, love it, love it!
  24. moonslav59
    Breggie had incentive his last year with HOU, too. His failures that year forced the pillow contract.
  25. moonslav59
    Coulda said the same about Crochet, Breggie, Chapman and Wilson, last winter.
×
×
  • Create New...