Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    108,893
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    161

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I think that would be a winning winter: Yamo or Urias + Montgomery Sonny Gray might be a good choice, as he might only get a 3-4 year deal.
  2. The Sox are currently 25th in defense, as measured by DRS (-19.) By Position (Rank in DRS) 3rd RF (+11) 13th C (+3) 13th 1B (+1) 14th SS (0) 26th LF (-7) 26th 3B (-10) 27th CF (-10) 29th 2B (-9)
  3. DHam homered (17th) and stole 2 bases (53) in Woo's 5-4 loss. POR won 8-3 as Hickey hit his 14th HR.
  4. Indeed. Nearly half his errors have been throwing, over his career. His range is good at 3B. This is why I think he'd be a big plus defender at 1B after maybe a month of work, there.
  5. Some of your call-ups just happened during printing press time. Sorry, if I missed any before hand.
  6. My position hasn't changed. I can't keep track of yours.
  7. Do you guys ever listen to yourselves?
  8. My updated list of SP'er I hope we pursue. I'd like to see us grap 2 from the top list, but hoping for 1 from the top and 1 from the second tier is likely asking for way too much: My list (not in any order) Ohtani (not someone we will sign Yamamoto age 25! Snell 30 Urias Just turned 27 Gray 33 Nola Just turned 30 Second Tier: Kershaw 35 Montgomery 30 Giolito 29 Flaherty 27 Wacha 32 ERod 30
  9. Stop trying to fix Devers. Don't tinker with success. His unique style helps the team and makes pitchers adjust to a non cookie cutter line-up.
  10. Perales, Wikelman, Mata, Gambrell Long shots: Walter, Murphy, Dobbins, Bastardo, Troye, Liu Far away" E R-C, Monegro, I Coffey, Rogers, Paez It's hard to know, but I'm not sure another Bello type is soon to be called up. I will say, this group looks no worse than many recent years, and this is after 5 recent and significant call-ups.
  11. My point wasn't about those 5 guys being great, but rather a marked improvement over any group of 3 to 5 pitchers since the Theo era. I'm not sure if it's a fluke or not, but if change does come, I expect it will be slowly, as it takes a minimum 4-6 years to develop a drafted or IFA pitcher into a mature ML pitcher. Bloom has not been our GM for 4 years, yet, and it seems you are already expecting greatness.
  12. TB Rays Drafts Pitching (Top 4 picks) 2010 4th pick J THompson- Long Beach St 2011 1st pick (24th) T Guerrieri- HS 6th pick (42nd) J Ames- Lower Columbia College 2012 4th pick (152) N Gannon- HS 2013 2nd pick (29) R Stanek- Arkansas (RP) 2014 none 2015 none 2016 none 2017 1st pick (4) B McKay- Louisville 2nd pick (31) D Rasmussen- Oregon St 3rd pick (40) M Mercado - HS 2018 1st pick (16) Liberatore- HS 2nd pick (31) McClanahan- So. Florida Post Bloom.... 2019 2nd pick (36) J Gross- HS 3rd pick (40) S Johnson- Campbell 4th pick (61) H Mullins- HS 2020 1st pick (24) N Bitsko- USA 3rd pick (57) I Seymour- VA Tech 4th pick (70) A Burleson- E Carolina 2021 none 2022 3rd pick (103) T Martin- Okl St I'm not seeing some great success story, here.
  13. Well, okay. The trade for Sale worked, and that was not that long ago. The Porcello trade was a good one, too. (It was the extension that killed us.) Start with the DD era. Almost all our best pitchers were not from our system and we did win 92+ games 4 times in 7 years. Look, I agree, the best system is one that develops strong pitchers on a pretty consistent basis. Nobody says that's a bad idea. But, if we start today, or started 4 years ago, it takes time for the results to start being seen, and in the mean time, only one solution can be used to carry us to that day, if that day ever comes: trading or buying pitchers. BTW, I'm not down on Bello. I'm just pointing out how it takes years for guys like him to become an ace, and maybe even 2024 is too soon to call him that, as he likely will not give us 190+ IP. Also, Bello was signed as an IFA in the summer of 2017. It's been just over 6 years, and he has just recently starting to contribute. Yes, college pitchers might be 4-5 years, 3 if lucky. Houck was drafted out of college in 2017. He started contributing in 2021: 4 years. Whitlock was drafted out of college in 2017: 4 years, again. Crawford? You guessed it: college 2017. It took him 5 years to contribute as a plus. Winckowski? Drafted from HS in 2016: 7 years to be a true plus in MLB.
  14. Picking out a GM's worst decision is not how I grade a GM. If it was, all would get an F.
  15. My words are uncountable. LOL
  16. Couldn't Bello, Houck, Whitlock, Crawford and Wink be a sign the times are changing? It could be possible, right? Have any changes been made on the farm, in the areas of scouting and developing pitching?
  17. You mean from the worst pitcher development system in the universe? BTW, Bello is not a beast of burden, yet. I doubt he gets over 190 IP in 2024, but I like him a lot. We need two 200 IP studs.
  18. Signing Eflin and Wacha and not Kluber and Brasier or Mondesi on the roster, and we are in a playoff slot, today.
  19. Even a much lesser move like trading for Civale, in August would have made us better, now and next year. (He may have 2 more years of control.)
  20. I'd say with average D, we'd have 6-9 more wins. With top 5 D, maybe 7-11 more wins.
  21. Most college drafted pitchers take 4 years to develop and actually start contributing at the ML level- minimum, except for very few exceptions. HS players take 5-6 or more. I stand by my 4-6 years for all pitching prospects as the vast majority fall in that range. Look it up. BTW, TBR had a pretty bad hit and miss rate on pitchers drafted. They are best known for scavenging other team's rosters and farm systems and acquiring good pitching, like Springs from us. Yes, they are known for developing some very well. Not a single poster disagrees on the idea that we need to improve our pitching prospect development system. Nobody. It's not an easy task, and if we have not done enough to do that, so far, that is a big mark against Bloom & Co. I'll drive that bandwagon. However, how will we know he hasn't or has done it until at least 4-6 years have gone by? I've already seen improvement on the pitchers we have called up since Bloom took over: Houck, Whitlock, Crawford, Wink and Bello are better than any group of 5 since Theo. You assume we have done nothing. Maybe you are right, but it takes time to know, and you seem to expect aces in 3-4 years. You are in a tiny minority on that opinion. You point to Price and Sale and you are right. They may have helped us win in 2018, but they did not earn their money. What about others not from our system? Pedro, Schilling, Beckett, Lackey and ERod? Those guys have worked out better than Lester, Buch, Masterson and Bello. I'm all for developing aces. I'm all for drafting better pitching, but no GM drafts pitching just because they are pitchers. They draft the best available player and maybe, just maybe, use position as the tie-breaker.
  22. Yes, and it's not like adding Bernardino to the list of Bloom's prospects added moves the needle all that much. If you don't count him, then he counts on the "gems in the rough" category and maybe moves the needle n that grade by 1/4th of a grade level.
  23. I'm all about adding to the top of the rotation and never from the bottom. Signing a #5 is a waste, unless you plan on him being your #6 or rotation depth. The point about the "wisdom" of waiting is from a top brass budget angle. It's a waste to sign a $30M pitcher for a team destined to miss the playoffs, anyway. Offense is more exciting for fans of losing teams or .500 teams. I fully understand the value of having at least 2 beasts of burden at the top of a rotation. One is never enough. Right now, we have none.
  24. Well said. I believe JH & Co will spend very big, again and soon. I don't see the value in waiting until 2025 or 2026. We only have Dugo, Pivetta, Jansen and Martin for one more year. Why not start, this winter. You can replenish for 2025 with the help of Sale's expiring contract. Devers is in peak prime. Story and Yoshida will be past prime, soon. Those are our biggest investments, right now. Why wait any longer? Our core of maturing young players with 1-3 years under their belt is at its highest numbers in many years: Casas, Duran, Wong, Bello, Crawford, Houck, Whitlock & Wink. Our core of veteran role players with some history of success is enough to set up a situation whereby only 3-4 major slots need to be filled, this winter, which is the fewest since 2019: Dugo, Urias, Reyes, McGuire, Refsnyder, Schreiber and long shot Sale. On top of all this, we have a few exciting young players looking to bust onto the scene and win a FT or major role position on the team: Rafaela, Abreu and maybe even EValdez, Rosier or longer shots like DHam, S Scott, Meidroth, Gambrell, Mata, Murphy, Robertson, Guerrero or Walter. Returning from injury and possible depth: Joely, Kelly, or Mills. To me, our 2024 looks very well set up for us to think about adding quality over quantity. Just 2 key additions to the rotation could be enough. Adding a big RH'd bat and a pitcher for rotation/pen depth would be welc ome, too. I see only 4 key players needed, this winter. That has not been the case since before Bloom took over.
×
×
  • Create New...