Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,528

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    The funny thing about Ort was that his problem was always the BBs. He has 10Ks and 1 BB in 8 IP. Ort, Brasier and Kelly have pitched 23.2 innings with 24 hits (not bad and 11 from Ort) and 11 BBs, thanks mostly to 6 from Kelly. WHIP 2.06 Bleier 1.64 Kelly 1.50 Ort 1.42 Crawford (some as SP) 1.32 Brasier 1.50 Schreiber 1.29 Martin 1.20 Jansen 0.92 Wink
  2. moonslav59
    Can anyone name one RP'er who has been more consistently good over the last 11 straight seasons? 1.1 to 3.4 fWAR every year from 2011 to 2022, except: 0.3 in 2018 0.6 in 2020 (pro-rate to 1.6) Saves per season/BS: 25/7 28/4 44/5 36/2 47/6 41/1 (led league) 38/4 33/8 11/2 (Pro-rate to 29/5) 38/5 41/7 (led league) Career 394 saves/52 BS (88%) 2.62 ERA 0.940 WHIP 13.0 K/9 65.1 IP in Playoffs (20 saves) 2.20 ERA 0.796 WHIP 12.9 K/9
  3. moonslav59
    What is with all the catcher interferences, this year- both by and to us?
  4. moonslav59
    We also had a couple days off, so if you look at days vs appearances and IP, no RP'er looks close to being overused. 15 Games in 17 Days (IP/Gm) SP 14/3 Houck 14/3 Pivetta 13/3 Kluber 12/3 Sale 12/2 GS + 1 RP Crawford 5/1 Whitlock RP 12/6 Winckowski 8.1/8 Brasier 8.0/7 Ort 8.0/8 Schreiber 7.1/6 Kelly 7.0/7 Martin 5.1/6 Bleier 5.0/5 Jansen No RP'er has averaged more appearances than 8 in 17 days (less than once every 2 days.) Most are averaging about .41 to .47 IP per day. One could argue Jansen needs more work to stay sharp. I think we are looking pretty good, this time of year. I'm hopeful having Whitlock in the rotation will help, and some of the struggling SP'ers will start doing better and maybe going 5-6 IP.
  5. moonslav59
    Being down twice and still winning is a good sign that this team has some fight in them. It was good to see some slumping players show life. We are still getting some breaks, but we are taking advantage of them, often. Wong Chang were 4 for 7 with 2 runs and 4 rbi. We got on base a lot... 2/5 Verdugo 2/5 Turner (+catcher interference) 4/5 Refsnyder (someone bitched about him batting 3rd) 1/5 Devers (HR) 2/4 Kike 0/3 Arroyo/Tapia (+ reach on catcher interference) 1/4 Casas 2/3 Wong/McGuire (+reach on catcher interference) 2/4 Chang
  6. moonslav59
    13 man staffs help. Wink pitching 2-3 innings every few days helps. We have Bello and Paxton due, soon. For early in the season, SP'ers going 4-5 IP every game is not so bad for the pen. 14 games: who is close to being burnt out? IP/Gm 12/6 Wink 7.1/6 Kelly 7.1/7 Brasier 7.0/7 Schreiber 7.0/7 Martin 7.0/6 Ort 4.1/5 Bleier 4.0/4 Jansen 3.0/1 Crawford Brasier, Ort and Kelly are exchangeable for Bello, Paxton and Crawford.
  7. moonslav59
    Nope.
  8. moonslav59
    Everybody WONG- CHANG, Tonight!
  9. moonslav59
    We've had great success making blockbuster trades for top SP'ers, but the last one was Sale backin December 2016. (The extension sucked.) Other big trades for aces: Beckett (NOV 2005) Schilling (NOV 2003) Pedro (NOV 1997) Other notables: Peavy (post ace) JUL 2013 ERod (was a prospect and never an ace) JUL 2014 Porcello (ace for a year) DEC 2014 Pomeranz (why did I even bring him up?) JUL 2016 Eovaldi (ace for a series) JUL 2018 Pivetta (ace of the 5th starters) AUG 2020
  10. moonslav59
    Last few starts: 4/14 Houck 4 IP 2 ER 4/13 Kluber 4.2 4 ER (1 ER through 4.1 IP & left game w 2 ER in 4.2) 4/12 Freakin Chris Sale 4/11 Whitlock 5 IP 5 ER (Was at 3 ER in 4.2 before back-to-backers) 4/10 Pivetta 5 IP 0 ER 4/9 Crawford 5 IP 1 ER 4/8 Houck 5 IP 2 ER 4/6 Sale 5IP 3 ER 4/5 Kluber 5IP 1 ER 4/4 Pivetta 5IP 3ER
  11. moonslav59
    I fixed that for you. It's going to be much better.
  12. moonslav59
    Jad posted this afternoon, on the other thread.
  13. moonslav59
    It's possible, with some pitchers & catchers, the pitch calling is a very small part of it, or it's more about the pitcher's confidence in his catcher's pich-calling than the actual pitch the catcher calls for.
  14. moonslav59
    He's also 22. Mayer is 20.
  15. moonslav59
    Our BAbip is bad, so it seems we've had bad luck with lucky good results.
  16. moonslav59
    It's more than just calling pitches. It may be some really weird and hard to identify intangibles between some pitchers and catchers- like how and/or how quickly the catcher places his target, what sort of stance the catcher assumes, how that catcher talks to the pitcher when going to the mound, body language or others I can't even think of.
  17. moonslav59
    Agreed. The end result was, we moved on from Vaz and Plawecki and ended up with McGuire and Wong (Alfaro). One can look how that worked out, but with so many moving parts and a wide financial disparity, it's like comparing apples to watermelons.
  18. moonslav59
    Not many hot hitters on our team, right now: Last 14 days: 1.666 Duvall 1.014 Devers .933 McGuire (1.000 last 7 days) .917 Tapia (just 12 PAs) .775 Verdugo .637 Turner .628 Yoshida .625 Kike .586 Dalbec (11) .542 Refsnyder .524 Casas .458 Wong .394 Arroyo .111 Chang (These last 3 guys have 86 PAs in the last 13 games- YUCK!) .
  19. moonslav59
    Fully understandable. The sample size is small. Let's see how we feel in a few months.
  20. moonslav59
    I think the hope was that the very inexpensive catching tandem of McGuire and Wong could come close to what Vaz and Plawecki gave us and were projected to do going forward, and with the money saved, we could direct more resources at upgrading other positions that, in theory, might far outweigh any loss we might see at the catching position. Also, the longer term hopes of McGuire, Wong and maybe even Hickey and Brannon came into play in the decision made. Vaz would have taken a longer term commitment that we wanted to give him.
  21. moonslav59
    ...and like it or not, there was no way we were going to pay Vaz even close to what he got via free agency, so we basically traded away 2 months from a lost and broken season for Abreu and EValdez. If you want to combine the two trades to match up positions, we traded: 2 months of Vaz & 1 yr and 2 months of Diekman (and about $5M in contract cost) for McGuire, EValdez & Abreu Nothing Vaz does going forward changes the results of the trade, IMO. It is a separate issue. I doubt Diekman shines, this year and makes us wish we still had him. The guys we got back are all potential (or "suspect" as Red might call them,) but between the three, I'm thinking at least one should be helpful.
  22. moonslav59
    One could argue Cora's line-up construction has maximized our run-scoring to near miraculous proportions... We are 4th in runs scored in MLB and 26th in BA at .230, 21st in wRC+ at 95 and 16th in OPS at .724
  23. moonslav59
    Agreed, and I have often said maybe the variances have little to do with any skillset, and is just about some sort of comfort level thing based on who knows what, but I do think some pitchers, and perhaps many pitchers, for whatever reason, just do significantly better with one guy over another.
  24. moonslav59
    Indeed, a head scratcher. I was willing to hand Diekman away or even pay a little of his contract for a bag of balls, so I'm getting your point, and then some. Certainly, some sort of cloud hangs over McGuire's head.
  25. moonslav59
    The Sox are 4th in MLB is runs scored with 76 in 14 games (5.4 per game.) We have been aided by Reach on Errors as we have aided our opps, too. We have also got on base 9 times via HBP (T3 in MLB.) Other offensive rankings: T8th in lowest K% at 21.3% 9th in HRs w 18 16th in OPS at .724 T28th in BAbip at .265 Pitching 12th in K-BB% at 14.7% 16th xFIP at 4.54 25th in ERA- at 111 25th WHIP at 1.47 26th .320 BAbip (thanks to our D) 26th fWAR at +0.2 26th runs allowed at 76 (5 are unearned, but we all know the bad D caused many more than 5.) .
×
×
  • Create New...