Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    107,066
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    144

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Making it sound like he's calling in sick is not a good comp, IMO. The connotation is he's choosing to not work.
  2. I have very high hopes for Cespedes.
  3. Sale had a worse injury track record than Story, and it wasn't even close.
  4. I'm fine with that plan. We have some flex, if someone does not come through (Mayer) or gets hurt (Story or ____.) The OF looks solid and deep, too, especially if Anthony comes through. Our catchers look fine, and we have Teel looking like a good future catcher.
  5. Not sure, either. Maybe, Mayer at 3B, Story at SS and Grissom at 2B. I'll leave to guess where Devers and Casas play.
  6. In a healthy Sale, for sure. I don't think many of us had faith in his health for 2024 and or 2025. The 2025 option was in serious doubt, before this season began. Plus, it's not like 2B has been a great position for us. Not only were we ranked 30th in fWAR at 2B from 2022-023, we were at -2.0.
  7. Don't tell me you don't know the rest of the story.
  8. True, and if Story moves to 3B.... We also have the Mayer squeeze as a possibility next year or 2026.
  9. True. You got me. That was not a fair statement and implied posters forgot his history. I did say "it's like..." not that people are saying he was never hurt or a question mark. It's just not being talked about by those gushing over a quarter season sample size of 2024. His 4-5 year recent history was why he was traded, and I will say, he was a still question mark, after last year, despite finishing the season healthy for the first time in over 4 years.
  10. Anyone know why Teel has only played one game since May 16th?
  11. I'm still optimistic about Grissom being our fine 2Bman for 5 years.
  12. Speaking of ex-Sox players... Some 2024 Numbers: OPS .978 Betts .821 JD M (83 PAs) .812 T Pham (92) .774 Moncada (44) .748 Dubon .734 Verdugo .727 Schwarber .662 Turner .627 Duvall (79) .602 Urias (88) .581 Bogey (not hearing any crying over Bogey, these days) .540 Espinal .513 Margot .494 Beni (should we trade Wink & Gambrell for Beni?) .486 Renfroe (How about DHam for Renfroe?) .368 Vazquez (Abreu & Valdez?) ERA (If under 40 IP, noted) 0.95 Strahm (19 IP) 2.11 Beeks (21) 2.22 Sale 2.61 Nate 2.84 Paxton 2.95 Ottavino (18) 3.20 R Fernandez (20) 3.32 Kopech (22) 3.45 Diekman (16) 3.63 Kimbrel (17) 4.37 Montas (35) 4.45 Wacha 4.63 Brasier 912) 4.70 Payamps (15) 6.75 Barnes (13) I might have missed a few.
  13. His only homer came when we were down 3-0 vs the yanks. He made it 3-2 in the 3rd. He did score a game winning run vs the Yanks as a PR'er. Dugo knocked him in.
  14. Metrics can help determine if a player has inflated stats due to luck, but I'm not sure that is something that speaks to future results. My guess is Wong's wOBA and xwOBA have improved over past seasons, so maybe that continues to improve, and his other numbers stay the same or don't drop as much as one might expect.
  15. Then he lost the GM's phone number and the deadline expired.
  16. cots says they were about $18M over, last year and projected at $28.4M over, this year (a $9.5M tax)
  17. His D should be okay at 2B as the floor. It's not like he has never hit the ball hard, but clearly he has been struggling in his first 13 games. Had sale gotten hurt or sucked, I doubt this would be such a hot topic.
  18. How could I have forgotten? He even had a better OPS with BOS than Grissom has, and less PAs.
  19. Correct. It MAY end up being less or way less than 5 more years, but that is really a pessimist view (kinda like the view most of had on Sale ever doing anything for us, again.)
  20. The other part of any Duran trade is what we get back and at what position. Even if Duran does not decline or even gets better, the return guy could still end up with more value. Most posters who talked about possibly trading Duran were thinking we'd package him for a very good SP'er. I'm glad we didn't trade him, but I don't know what the return would have been. I expect a return would look better, on paper, now, but who knows. I'd keep him.
  21. We all do. He might end up being the next Jeter Downs, although he never made the bigs. He seemed to have a decent bat with ATL over 64 games and 236 PAs (.746 OPS,) but maybe that was just fluff. His D at SS was lacking, but many felt he'd be okay to decent at 2B. He got hurt, got sick, lost a ton of weight, and missed some ST'ing. He has played in 13 games with 53 PAs. I'd say he has given us nothing to a negative value, so far, but it's just 13 games. He has something like 5 more years to prove himself.
  22. True. With the team 3-7 in Crawford starts, you never know. Certainly, up to now, having Sale over Grissom would have given us a much better chance at winning 1-4 more games. Going forward is the great unknown.
  23. I'm against the idea of trading Duran, but he is at his highest value, ever. He may raise that value, but his trade value is high, right now. Without Duran, our OF future would look like this: LF: Abreu/Refsnyder (Lugo?) CF: Rafaela/Anthony RF: Anthony/Abreu That's not bad. It is drop off from one with Duran, but what would be the increase with the return value and where would that improvement be? Again, I would not trade Duran. (Many of us would have 1.5+ years ago, when his value was low or so-so.)
  24. What's interesting is that in 5 of those 6 starts we had Wink and Bernardino pitch 13.2 IP, combined with just 2 ERs allowed. I realize3 the taxing of the pen is the point, and is a good point. Here is a breakdown of the wins and losses by SP'er and their ERAs. If ever there was an argument to be made about a pitcher's W-L record, or the team's W-L record in his starts, not being all that meaningful, this would be an example: 5-1 Criswell 2.67 5-2 Bello 3.96 3-2 Pivetta 3.04 5-5 Houck 1.94 2-4 Pen starters 3-7 Crawford 2.17 1-3 Whitlock 1.94
  25. They should have and could have signed more SP'er depth, even if to minor league deals. Criswell and Uwasawa were not enough. That being said, we did lose Gio for the season, and Pivetta, Bello, and Whit for a few games. That is hard for most teams to cover. No excuses: we dropped the ball on this.
×
×
  • Create New...