No. I answered why. You just didn't like my answer.
I gave the 4 year numbers, also, since that is how long Bobby Dee has been on the Sox, and it included his best season (2020.)
Yes, I like to use the 3 recent year sample size, mostly, because I think it is better than career numbers, as an indicator of what to expect. I'm not locked into 3 years. If the 3rd year is a rookie year, I'd probably think the recent 2 years is a better indicator. If a player is aging and had a big year, 3 years ago, I might also think the recent 2 years is a better indicator.
I was not intentionally trying to make Ref look better than Bobby Dee. I went back 4 years, which helped Bobby Dee.
Here are the 3 year numbers you are crying about:
vs LHPs (250+ PAs)
43. Refsnyder .865 (142 wRC+)
67. Bobby Dee .836 (124 wRC+)
Why would I try to hide these numbers?
Ref blows BD away, again. 2 years and 3 years (and 4 yrs in wRC+, only.)
Geesh!
BTW, even the 4 year sample showed Ref with a wRC+ 10 points higher than BD.