Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Kimmi

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Kimmi

  1. It is no secret that I am not a fan of Dombrowsk's methods, but he is a very smart and experienced baseball ops guy. I think he has a very good read on where he stands on being able to sign JD. He does not feel the need to increase his offer to JD. I think that is a very telling sign.
  2. I have no doubt that whoever lands JD is likely to overpay. $125/5yr is an overpay. Another team could certainly swoop in and offer JD more money or more years. I just don't believe that a higher offer to JD currently exists, which is why Dombrowski has neither budged from his offer nor announced that he is moving in another direction.
  3. Multiple teams pursuing JD is likely. JD having a 6 year offer is not likely.
  4. Ha. Never heard of it (them). One word for heavy metal - UGH.
  5. Fair enough. I never said that Ben was without blame. I just feel like he receives too much blame and not enough credit. At the same time, I feel like Dombrowski receives too much credit for getting the team back into the playoffs when they were pretty much already at that point when he arrived. I have no doubt that Henry was looking for Dombrowski to take an aggressive approach. I blame Henry for not having enough patience to let Ben see his 5 year plan come to fruition.
  6. No, but if this drags into spring training, it could be to the detriment of the team.
  7. The fallacy of that article is that Silverman is suggesting that because one team was willing to hand out a bad contract, all the other teams should be willing to do so.
  8. Like a contending team without a foreboding cliff. It's hard to know what subsequent moves would have been made. But for instance, we might have focused on Darvish or Arrieta this offseason. Or traded for Stanton, then traded JBJ or Beni for starting pitching. Not that I'd be thrilled with doing that, but my point is that I think moves could have been made that kept the Sox competitive now without so much of the farm.
  9. I don't see how JD can have an offer that is higher than or equal to the Red Sox offer. If he did, then Dombrowski would either top it, or he knows he's not going to top it and he would move on. This is just Boras and JD thinking that JD deserves more than what the Sox offered, and hoping that Dombrowski will eventually cave as spring training draws closer. It is time for Dombrowski to set a take it or leave it deadline.
  10. Well if people would just stick with fWAR, we wouldn't have to worry about it.
  11. But they mostly all become free agents within a year of each other. We don't have the cost controlled quality to replace them, and we can't keep them all.
  12. My spin has nothing to do with gagging in the playoffs. The playoffs are a crapshoot. My point is that we were likely playoff bound anyway with the signing of Price. I wasn't thrilled with that contract either, but I understand that we needed a top pitcher that offseason, and he cost only money.
  13. Alternative moves - Don't trade for Kimbrel or Sale. That's the gist of it. I am on record as not being thrilled about either of those moves when they happened. They were both overpays, and IMO, the trade for Sale was overkill. I'm pretty sure we would have won the division in 2016 without Kimbrel. We might not have won the division in 2017 without Sale and Kimbrel, but that would have been due to injuries that were unforeseen at the time of the Sale trade.
  14. Hanley > Braun
  15. I am not interested in Braun either.
  16. Can you say 'cliff'?
  17. If we win a title, Dombrowski will be justified and forgiven for trading away the farm.
  18. I think you give Dombrowski too much credit or leeway. He could have built a contending team without depleting the farm.
  19. Why do we need another catcher? Especially one that will cost prospects?
  20. You should go see the movie I, Tonya.
  21. Ouch. The Brewers are dealing. I'm glad at least one team is.
  22. Let the Clay era 2.0 begin!
  23. Meh. I was hoping for someone more along the lines of Darvish, but his contract will not be reasonable. The shorter term deal for Arrieta might be the way to go.
  24. Yup, this is what I mean.
×
×
  • Create New...