Kimmi
-
Posts
27,883 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Kimmi
-
-
I agree, that was a good signing for the Yankees. However, I don't think it would have been a good signing for the Sox. He was good as a LF and a DH playing in YS with a short right field porch. He would not have been good as a CF or playing half his games in Fenway.
-
-
Never posted here before.
-
LMAO.
-
I like the idea of signing Beltran, although his ability to play everyday in the field is a concern due to his knees. I can't see both Ortiz and Beltran being signed, and personally, I'd rather the Red Sox didn't. I would prefer rotating players in the DH role. Youkilis could probably benefit from the time out of the field, as could Beltran. Between Lavarnway, Beltran, Youkilis, and whomever else is on the bench, there should be no shortage of power from that spot. Then, you're also not handcuffed in games played in NL parks.
-
For the first four years of the contract? Yup. No, he didn't live up to most people's expectations in terms of RBIs and HRs. No, he didn't play up to his personal potential. No, he wasn't the middle of the order bat that I think most were expecting. But yes, he did earn his contract up until this year.
-
-
I'm awake. Lay off the booze.
-
WTF does that have to do with anything? That's exactly the point that I'm trying to make.
-
-
Valid point about the cascading effect that losing one reliever has on the rest of the bullpen. This is precisely why I always thought it was a bad idea to trade Paps at the end of last season, when many people were for that idea. I hate losing Papelbon too, but another GM's willingness to fork out a bad contract should not mean that the Red Sox should buy into it. We have enough bad contracts on our hands to deal with as is. Adding another one would only make things worse for the long term. A good, consistent closer can be found for a lot less money.
-
Papelbon was the best closer available and one of the best in the business. I hate to see him go. That said, it would have been insane to sign him to a 4 year deal @ $12.5 mil per year. Long term contracts for relievers are never a good idea. Take the draft picks, and take the money saved on a closer, and put it to use where we really need it - in the rotation.
-
That seems to be a chief criticism of Drew, that he wasn't a Dirt Dog. I bet that if he had produced exactly the same, played the same number of games, but dove for balls more frequently, ran into walls a few more times, and slammed his helmet a few times, many Drew critics would have a different opinion of worth while with the Red Sox. Drew sucked this year, there's no sugarcoating that. Over the first four years, however, Drew was worth his contract. Unfortunately, his contract was one year too long, which is almost always the case with long term deals.
-
-
Just wondering Elktonnick, if you HAD to pick one single stat as the best stat to measure a player's offensive production, what would you use? Obviously, trying to evaluate a player on a single stat is ridiculous, but I'm wondering where you rank OPS and OPS+ relative to the other stats out there. In your opinion, is it a better measure of a player's offensive production, than RBIs, for instance?
