Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Kimmi

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Kimmi

  1. Here is MLB's statement in response to Tony Clark's earlier statement: Major League Baseball issued the following statement today in response to the comments made by MLBPA Executive Director Tony Clark: "Our Clubs are committed to putting a winning product on the field for their fans. Owners own teams for one reason: they want to win. In Baseball, it has always been true that Clubs go through cyclical, multi-year strategies directed at winning. "It is common at this point in the calendar to have large numbers of free agents unsigned. What is uncommon is to have some of the best free agents sitting unsigned even though they have substantial offers, some in nine figures. It is the responsibility of players' agents to value their clients in a constantly changing free agent market based on factors such as positional demand, advanced analytics, and the impact of the new Basic Agreement. To lay responsibility on the Clubs for the failure of some agents to accurately assess the market is unfair, unwarranted, and inflammatory." Spot on, if you ask me.
  2. I can understand that he is frustrated. He had ideas of close to $200 million for 6-7 years in his head, which would make the Sox offer seem like a lowball. However, saying that he prefers to sign with another team has obviously done him no favors among Red Sox fans. If he does end up signing with us, he will not be starting off on the right foot. If he starts of the season struggling, things can go south for him in a big hurry.
  3. Or perhaps there is something to what all those people are posting?
  4. If JD thinks the Red Sox are being so inflexible, let him find a better offer from another team. When he finds one, he can bring it back to the Red Sox, and perhaps the Sox will become more flexible. Until then, there is no reason for the Red Sox to bend. I want JD, but if he's not going to be happy signing here for "so little money", then I don't want him.
  5. My feelings exactly. I would like to sign JD, but we don't need him.
  6. Yup! As would be signing Buchholz to a minor league deal!
  7. Pedroia is not a negative OWAR batter. He has a negative OWAR because of his baserunning. MVP knows this.
  8. I'm not so sure about that.
  9. Exactly. The projected contract for Porcello was a good bit higher than what the Red Sox paid him. A 4 year contract for a then 27 year old pitcher top to mid rotation pitcher is almost a no brainer.
  10. I'm not signing Machado next year. I'd rather keep Porcello. Which is not to imply that I think Porcello is a better player. But Porcello is a better value than Machado and his hefty contract will be.
  11. It means giving him a day off more often than he's had in the past, but it doesn't mean he'll be a bench player. I'd rather Pedroia take a day off here and there and be able to get through the season in pretty good health, than try to play almost everyday and be done in August.
  12. I have said it before, and I'll say it again. I'd do that extension over again any day of the week.
  13. Robert Murray‏Verified account @RobertMurrayFRS Just talked to an agent who believes that we won’t see many, if any of the top free agents come off the board until March. “It’s horrific,” the agent said. “I think that’s where we are headed.” 5:02 PM - 6 Feb 2018 We could be waiting several more weeks for anything to happen.
  14. I have always been a fan of signing 2nd tier type players to 2-3 year contracts, as opposed to signing the top guys to 5+ years.
  15. I think he can finish the season on the field, but I think Cora will have to manage his playing time very carefully. I am not opposed to signing Nunez for the right price.
  16. I do not get the eagerness to trade Porcello.
  17. He obviously didn't need the money. Sometimes, there are more important things.
  18. I don't think he's a bad guy either. I do think he needs to come to grips with the reality of what the market will bear, though.
  19. I, OTOH, have all the respect in the world for Dempster.
  20. Good point. I still find it disheartening though.
  21. I wish there were more players who would leave money on the table and take a lesser contract for one reason or another. Maybe because they don't want to uproot their family. Maybe because they were born and raised in a city and want to play for their hometown. Or whatever reason. It is disheartening that it's almost always just about the money. Then, so often it seems like the player who just went after the biggest contract ends up unhappy. Are they really going to miss $10 million when they are making $125 million?
  22. While it's certainly possible that JD does not want to play in Boston, I take that comment to be more about JD being unsatisfied with the current offer rather than being disinterested.
  23. I understand what you're saying. I can't imagine that Dombrowski would allow JD to sign elsewhere for that amount. JD is too good a fit for us. I have to believe that Dombrowski would be willing to go as high as $150 million, if there were competitive bid from another team. Which, again, is what leads me to believe that there are no other competitive offers.
  24. A couple of players may take a step back, but there were so many underperformances last year that the offense, as a whole, should see a fair amount of improvement. No doubt that adding JD would help even more. Because of health concerns, I am still more concerned about our starting rotation than I am about our offense.
  25. For the draftees and the team controlled players, I can see that. For the free agents, I don't see MLB as a monopoly.
×
×
  • Create New...