Of course. And I'm not saying that everyone has to embrace the new stats. I'm really not. I firmly believe, though, that if one is going to debate on a baseball forum, being able to support one's opinion with numbers goes a lot further than anecdotal evidence.
I do understand that not everything can be supported by data. I have made arguments that I cannot support by data. However, if someone showed me strong statistical data that went against my opinion, I would not brush the data off as being wrong or useless. I would rethink my opinion and consider that I might be wrong.
It's okay if you don't embrace analytics. It's not okay, IMO, to say that you embrace analytics or see the value in them, use them when they support your opinion, but then blow them off as useless when they say something that contradicts your beliefs or opinions. And I don't mean 'you' personally.