Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

jad

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    4,740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jad

  1. I remember exactly where I was when I heard Kennedy had been shot, and also when I heard the call of Nava's g.s.
  2. I remember Smolz, Nipper, and of course Wake. No others, even though the radio has been on almost constantly for RS games in my house since '72 (at least during the summer) and well before!
  3. Yeah, one of several, as I recall, brought in as if to relive the apparent magic of getting rid of Nomar. Orlando to Renteria to Lugo ...
  4. There are certain posters who have apparently been brought up in a self-created culture of grievance, and have been deluded into thinking that a sign of sensitivity and depth of soul is feeling and rooting out 'offense'.
  5. But then, 'expectations' is a slippery concept. the only way to judge GMs on a quantitative basis would be by comparing results against available financial resources, no? (And that would take a few years of his tenure to determine.)
  6. Public figures do not have the same protections (even legal protections) for libel and slander as ordinary citizens. So if you want to be a public figure, you really need to grow a thicker skin. Whereas us poor slobs here--you know, we feel REALLY BAD when we listen to some whippersnapper give us moral lectures. It's SOOOOOO hurtful.
  7. You don't buy the "the hooker lied about her age" defense? (I have a feeling we're going to be hearing versions of that defense a lot in the coming weeks or months.)
  8. I admit, I don't think of RI much. In fact, the last time I was there was 35 years ago, when I drove down from Maine in a snowstorm, thinking, of course, I would go straight across the bridge rather than Rte 1. I failed to note that Rte 128 had been renamed '95' until I saw the signs for Providence.
  9. Getting back to the list, (which is a lot more amusing to me than grandiose, philosophical and moral speculations about the Decline of the West) the taxpayers of Rhode Island would like to nominate C. Schillung.
  10. Agree on Urbina! But couldn't Carl Everett get at least an honorable mention?
  11. I think we should argue grammar and spelling conventions instead. I'll start by noting the EGREGIOUS error above of representing the possessive of Gammons as Gammons' rather than Gammons's. (And people wonder why this world is going to hell).
  12. Since when is it bad form to post 'old' news? 99% of what posters say and argue here has been said before many many times.
  13. I can certainly "relate to" negotiations (owner vs. worker). I just am aware that the financial situation of all these particular participants is way beyond anything I have experience with or ever want to have experience with.
  14. Have you seen the Sopranos episode where Paulie and some other dumb-ass gangster (Chrissy?) argue over Nostradamus, Notre Dame, and Quasimodo?
  15. I don't really "relate to" any of the uber-rich entertainers I watch, whether on sports fields or movie screens. Why would I?
  16. I think it's time for Old Red to join the IGNORE crowd.
  17. Can't wait for the moralistic twits to cry out in high dudgeon: "THAT DOES IT. I am NEVER taking my kids to Cooperstown again. Take THAT, MLB!!!!"
  18. I love the standards of "proof" invoked against Ortiz (well a report by this guy citing second- or third-hand an unpublished report by these people says that ...) Very much like those proving vaccines don't work, that COvid is a left-wing conspiracy, and that the Cowboys are the best team ever. I don't give a rat's ass whether he 'used'; I actually care more about whether Ty Cobb was a murderer. But neither affects the question of whether these guys should be included among the best players ever.
  19. Bonds and CLemens should be in there. Arod too, of course. Rose is a special case, since as I recall, he made a deal with Giamatti to keep the info they gathered on him sealed, a deal he backed out of as soon as Giamatti died. He's a scum-bag, a cheap-shot artist, and a nincompoop, but as long as the results of that investigation are made public (or have they been already?), then sure. Those 4 are among the greatest players ever with the most influence on the sport. Of COURSE they should be in the HOF. Even Schilling, speaking of scum-bags, although it would be nice if this anti-government right-wing a-hole would first pay back the $70 million or so he gladly scammed from those detestable librul taxpayers of RI.
  20. You're right. Replacement players (even replacement officials) don't work. Why would I pay $150 to see guys I could see in Portland for $10? And part of it is also the "star" system. I want to see stars (people everyone knows about). I would have paid to see Williams, Mays, Arod even way past their primes when many no-names probably had more talent. That's what spectator sports is about.
  21. But someone left him out, putting Yaz in left. (I guess Yaz played first at some point? Don't recall that.)
  22. I'm not certain of the rules, which make no sense if Williams is not included.
  23. No, we don't, because we miss a season of baseball. There's no making up for that, period.
  24. EVERYTHING said on any sports board has been said and explained before (as has this assertion).
  25. As I understand it, yes. The RS were on the hook for tax on that salary if he made an MLB roster. So it must have come down to a calculation of what that hit would be in relation to the lux. tax limit, vs. what little they might save by releasing or trading him (no one was going to take on much of his salary).
×
×
  • Create New...