jad
-
Posts
4,477 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by jad
-
I think it very unlikely that a bunch of ESPN posters have access to the inner thoughts of two players who have never bothered to share those thoughts with anyone.
-
Oh well. At least the starting pitching has once again turned it around, as they were advised to do a few weeks ago.
-
Exactly. And he criticized Doerr's insistence on "a level swing" specifically because it was not in line with the path of the ball. (Also, the mound would have been a lot higher in those days than it is now, right? or was the height increased in the 60s and 70s before lowered to accommodate all the poor slobs who had to swing against Bob Gibson?)
-
It wouldn't be as fun to watch, but (in terms of team success) I'd rather have a CF who went 1-3 and let that ball drop in front of him.
-
Uh oh. JBJ at the plate again. At least the DP isn't possible.
-
Why? It's almost certain JBJ would have struck out or (at best) ground weakly into a double play.
-
Not many will be asked to bunt in order to get to the no. 9 hitter. But this is JBJ.
-
How is he selling out for power? He's hitting over .300, no?
-
That was typical of his strike-out swing. I think he missed that by almost a foot.
-
Except for that bit about the bottom half of the inning.
-
Well, that was short-lived.
-
I have never understood the animosity for former players one finds in sports. True, when your now-ex leaves you, you are p.o'd. But sports isn't life, and once I get familiar w/ a player on one team, I will always keep an eye out for him on the next. So yes, I like Ellsbury (horribile dictu); I want Puig to do well (LA connections); Clemens, Boggs, etc. If I rooted for them on one team, I will do the same when they move. Why anyone would claim that fierce loyalty to a local team above all else is a virtue is beyond me, and I've been a RS fan for almost 7 decades.
-
I was joking (but then, maybe you were too). We're both idiots.
-
Obviously, as last night proves, you move Vasquez to 2nd base and DH Chavis.
-
And if I recall correctly (and on most things, I do not), his fielding wasn't as bad as his fielding reputation. I think he likely welcomed the fame his presumably horrendous fielding won him. [Just checked the NYT obit, which seems to confirm this: 'Power hitting evidently came easily to Stuart. But he worked at his fielding, and at times did well. After a banner year in 1961 he said: ''Isn't it odd? A guy bats .301 and has 35 homers. Then everybody starts to tell him what a good fielder he has become.''']
-
If Dick Stuart could start for the RS, I have no problem with Devers.
-
It's a great great city. (You can't possibly live where your moniker implies; I've only been through there a few times, and the most culturally significant thing I have witnessed there is a white tiger spraying on plexiglass. The only two places I dislike more in this area are in fact 90 miles from LA, and you're right, the traffic is brutal. )
-
Well, there have been a few RS worth watching who were not 'home-grown': guys like Pedro, Manny, Ortiz, JD, Chris Sale, Price, Schilling, etc. That said, I tend to agree with you!
-
The annual Jackie Bradley Jr thread (2019 Edition)
jad replied to Station 13's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Thanks. So the new agreement effectively prevents teams from signing a guy like that on speculation, right? Once they commit the money, it counts for the luxury tax. -
The annual Jackie Bradley Jr thread (2019 Edition)
jad replied to Station 13's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
It's before I had enough consciousness of the economics of baseball, but I recall reading somewhere during the A-rod mess that this was something the Yankees of the 50s and 60s were in a position to do and did--just sign young talent on speculation and let them rot in the minors with no real intention of bringing them up. In those pre-free-agency days, I wouldn't doubt that things like that happened pretty routinely. -
The annual Jackie Bradley Jr thread (2019 Edition)
jad replied to Station 13's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
I believe this is a glitch in the CBA that will be (somewhere in my mind I think it already has been?) addressed. It's similar to the old pre-free agency quirk that allowed a team to sign talented players and then simply park them in the minors to prevent other teams from taking them. (Or the A-Rod situation, where the Yankees were deliberately trying to punish him in any way they could just to get out of the contract. But they did not have the option to send him down.) -
Having spent 35 years in the classroom, I have to say I am convinced that parents should NOT be allowed to name their kids.
-
The annual Jackie Bradley Jr thread (2019 Edition)
jad replied to Station 13's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Maybe because he wants his $70 million. I also don't think the luxury tax situation would change. The only way to get out from under that contract is for someone else to take it. -
Totally agree.
-
4/29 vs Oakland Athletics
jad replied to Station 13's topic in Mike Grace Memorial Game Thread Forum
Don't you think it was because he thought it might give him a better shot at making millions in the future, even if he got caught? (Same reason I imagine any player risks it.)
