sk7326

The question Boegarts staying at short I think is really related to his size (6'3" 174 lbs) and his age (20). That is a frame that can still fill out and get really powerful. Can a 6'3", 190 lb guy be able to stick at SS to a reasonable degree? The industry consensus has shifted last couple of years from "no way" to somewhere between "maybe" and "probably". But for a guy with his size and his potential to get bigger, it's a very reasonable question to ask.

Speed is a quality - but 22 infield hits requires luck and speed, hitting the ball into some random dead spot on the infield. His .480 BABIP, that's just basic math. The idea that half of the balls he hit found holes is something which was not going to last - it hardly lasts for anybody. I had an open mind that there was a scouting related result here - that he got better at the plate. But really watching him it was hard to say that. He was not squaring up balls appreciably better. And there is ZERO evidence in his career record that he could be anything but a "well at least he's not killing you" hitter. He's a wizard with the glove and on a team like Detroit (or Boston) he could just soak up ground balls while being a glorified pitcher at the plate. But there is not a .300 hitter there. There is not a .280 hitter there, and there is certainly not a .700 OPS guy there. If Detroit got his defense and a .260/.300/.350 slash line they'd be doing backflips.

His struggles in 2011 were related to command. By 2012, his stuff had suffered and has not recovered. The move to the rotation correlated with just less effective pitches. A 5 mph drop in velo? Yuck!

Probably not much interesting - although bullpen arms are always in play ...

Aside from exposing him to waivers, not really. I suspect they'd like to see if a team would at least offer them a handful of magic beans or something first.

True. Forgot that option was still there.

There is definitely a severe anti-pitcher bias in the MVP for the reasons you cite ... although that clearly violates the rules that voters get. Ellsbury this year is the best CF in the American League not named Mike Trout. And that is a very worthy guy. His 2011 - I'd have given him the MVP, though Verlander was a great choice and Ellsbury had to take the fall for the Red Sox September injury-palooza. 30 is not too bad an age for a good athlete, but so much of his value is in his defense and legs. Can he hit to carry a corner position if he loses a step. It's possible, but not a percentage play. It's not that he won't have speed in 5 years - it's that he cannot play CF anymore and have to shift to a position with a much higher offensive "Mendoza line". If he had more than one season like 2011 and more than two seasons like 2011/2013 and if he was 28 entering the free agent market instead of 30, we'd be having a different discussion. Ellsbury's next team is probably not buying a ton of Ellsbury's physical/performance prime years. That is the interesting wager. I am with you - the 2013 version of Ellsbury is absolutely an $18-20M player. But Ellsbury's age 30-34 seasons being those sorts of seasons seems very unlikely from here.

Another complicating factor with Boegarts is getting him onto the 40-man roster ... expect THAT to happen before August 31. Because of the season ending injuries to Bailey, Kalish, Hanrahan, Miller - up to 4 September callups can be on the playoff roster. But they have to be on the 40-man first.

Plenty of time to bring up Boegarts or Middlebrooks - and most likely when nobody is looking. Trip was a good chance to do it, but not exactly shocked.

Current standings of consequence: Red Sox 70-46 Tigers 67-45 Athletics 64-49 Rays 66-47 (WC1, 2.5 GB in division) Rangers 65-50 (WC2, 0 GB in division) Orioles 63-51 (1.5 GB of WC2) Guardians 62-52 (2.5 GB of WC2, 6 GB in division) Royals 58-53 (5 GB of WC2) Yankees 57-56 (7 GB of WC2) As we have seen "anything" is possible - if a team rips off a 22-2 stretch, this is all a moot point. But playing the percentages - Royals and Yankees might just have too much work to do between games behind and "teams to hop over". It's whether Baltimore or Cleveland can catch Texas. (I think the TB/Boston loser is pretty probable for a WC spot no matter what)

Bradley was overmatched in his tour here - but he also had almost no experience above single-A. His spring was such a phenomenon that it was hard to ignore, but such a fluke that his slow start was sort of predestined. That said, his pitch recognition and approach are 10-year veteran level already ... he knows what is a strike, he just needs more experience hitting big league junk. He has been very good in the minors - and his return tours to the bigs have been solid. Can Bradley next season hit .250 as a 24 year old? We know HIS .250 will actually come with more meat than an Iglesias for instance - more power potential (though not amazing) and a legitimately good ability to get on base. Take a .340 OBP with a plus-level centerfield? That is a legitimate big league starter, and still with a few more years of growth/prime left.

His upside is not established theoretically ... but going from his performance at every level of baseball he has tried. He has been a poor hitter from his time in the farm to now. It's ok to project that going forward with improvement - .260 at the bigs would be an improvement over what he has shown, couple months of BABIP good fortune aside.

Well September 2011 could also be a case of small sample size theater. And it does not explain the actual drop in velocity - his STUFF took a step backwards, and that is the real thing. The velocity he lost trying to stretch himself out has not really returned meaningfully.

It's possible - though I think if that were the case it would have happened. Just looking at the stat lines, Boegarts has outperformed Middlebrooks in AAA. (the huge on-base difference, .368 vs .314 - more than makes up for any small differences in things like homeruns). The org is trying to figure out whether it makes sense for Boegarts to make the leap. It would be like Machado made in Baltimore - to a position he was not playing in the minors. I think DiSarcina's comments on Boegarts was to help quell the hype machine - just good spin control when facing the Nation. Sox defensively have been middle of the pack - whether it is errors or something more useful like UZR. Not saying the defense should not be considered, but I doubt it will hurt Boston too much.

Indeed - if the Red Sox have that horrendous stretch of injuries which derailed 2011 and 2012 (along with that 22-2 stretch Tampa had in 2011), things could change. But this team has been pretty lucky healthwise - enough starting depth to withstand Buchholz' loss, and injuries to closers in the grand scheme of things is not a big deal relative to injuries in other places. The position players have been far more available than they have been in the recent past. Sometimes it just takes some health.

Iggy showed his potential here. Almost all of his special value is with his glove - he had to hit just acceptably enough to play him. When half of his balls in play were finding holes, that made sense. If he hit .118 it doesn't. But if he can be a solid .260 sort of hitter - and with him that .260 does not come with any special plate discipline or extra base ability - that is good enough to justify having his glove out there. The theory on Boegarts is the exact opposite. Can he justify the glove enough to stay at SS - will his body allow this to happen? It's the difference between him being an elite prospect and a very good one.

Sox, Rays, Orioles, Yankees, Jays ... has been best division in baseball. Even the Red Sox doomsday forecasts coming into the year were a bit silly - I am surprised that the division winner will get to 95 wins probably, just thought last place would be like 80-82.

oh a hanging curve ... Drew has done a nice job this season when healthy

Hamilton's approach started to fail him towards the end of last year - and this year clearly. Upton has been a 3-win sort of player and young enough to be a little more - obviously things have worked out to your prophecy so far.

Well Bard was a major job switch - that is one thing. Middlebrooks is a different animal - his approach was awful last year too, but it was redeemed by guys not having a ton of tape on him. The idea I think was a low pressure place for him to learn how to recognize pitches - and not worry about the spiral of ineptitude he had worked himself into. But if there hasn't been progress - who knows. Obviously this weekend lends itself to a call-up so we'll see.

Dempster is giving them about all they could ask so far. Really just one mistake.

Last year's free agent push excepted, he has generally been a good "approach" guy at the plate (caught Josh Hamilton disease, trading walks for homeruns and strikeouts). The value in the free agent market was his age, and that he played a position that is hard to find. Braves are regretting the decision to effectively "trade" Bourn for Upton - but both high risk and Upton was the upside play. Neither have set the world on fire - though fly balls go to die when they are around.

Might be one of those cases where it won't get well until the offseason - if it's a core injury of some kind. You could skip a start maybe - that is an option, and Farrell did bump everybody back with the Wright start (and frankly Dempster looks as sharp as he has in a month, although Houston is awful). Whatever is going on - he has battled his butt off, but it has been a slog.

WMB is probably better than Holt, but he can't play 2B - so unless he can do that, Holt needs to stay up. Snyder is another story. WMB's approach was broken going back to the minors - if he showed progress, he'd be back. You don't think that the Sox WANT Middlebrooks to be the guy? He just hasn't shown it. IF he could just put together good at-bats, which has been a problem for him his entire career.

Dempster actually has looked solid today ... clearly the odd man out rotationwise for the playoffs right now - but so far, 4 Ks - one bad pitch really.