Bellhorn04
-
Posts
54,853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
76
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Bellhorn04
-
E-Rod signs for 1 year and $8.3 million, avoiding arbitration.
-
A bit of Rays analytics mania involved there, perhaps. -
E-Rod signs for 1 year and $8.3 million, avoiding arbitration.
-
Nobody ever predicts this stuff very accurately. Doesn't stop them from trying, though. It's like me and my weekly NFL picks vs. the spread. I fail almost every week and yet I go into the next week with renewed optimism.
-
What do you predict he signs for?
-
It's the ones who threaten to leave who never do.
-
RD is not the same level of player as Mookie, and his contract expectations should reflect that.
-
You are seriously f***ed in the head LOL
-
He's 24 - how many great seasons would you expect him to have by now?
-
It might take 12 years to know for sure.
-
For tax purposes, it's $15M. His AAV is $31M. The $16M we're paying is what counts for us for payroll tax. For the Dodgers it's $15M.
-
It was a very good return, but we can't ignore one little X factor. As it turned out, the Dodgers didn't merely acquire Betts for 1 year. They acquired him for 13 years, and precluded the Red Sox from ever seeing him in their uniform again.
-
Both points are debatable. He didn't trade Devers. As for the budget, we don't know how he'd handle that because it's been so long since he was in that position.
-
I mostly give DD a pass on trading prospects, because he only traded them for two things: 1) Pitching - which we needed desperately. 2) Deadline acquisitions.
-
Yes, when you have that window and you know it's going to close soon, it's pretty hard to resist.
-
And then he followed much the same pattern with the Cubs.
-
Sounds pretty plausible to me. The dots connect.
-
Payroll tax numbers: Martinez - 2 more @ 22 AAV Pedroia - 1 more @ 13.75 AAV Price - 2 more @ 16 AAV At least Martinez might help.
-
No, that's not what I meant. I meant IF he was great in 2016 and 2017 and sucked after that, we would have been happy to get rid of him, too. He was more like disappointing and tantalizing for 4 years.
-
Unless those two seasons were 2016-2017, I suppose. All things considered, shedding $15 million of his AAV the next two years is good for us. For the Dodgers, if they get two good years, or even one very good one, it'll be a nice little bonus for them.
-
Yeah, I don't even like the idea of winning the WS as a goal. I agree that winning 85+ games and being in the hunt in September would be a fine goal.
-
I think they could too. Let's face it, sometimes it depends on a lot of luck. In 2013, guys like Victorino, Napoli and Drew performed like Supermen, only to turn back into Clark Kents the next year. 2020's list of asks for great luck might look like this: 1) E-Rod 2) Eovaldi 3) Sale 4) Houck All of the above outperform expectations. 5) Chaim Bloom pulls off a few minor miracles in upgrades the next few months. 6) Raffy Devers is so excited by the return of Cora that he puts up a 7 WAR season. And so forth.
-
I think that part of the trade was kind of a wash. I'm not thrilled about it and I'm not terribly disappointed about it. If Price stays healthy and pitches well the next two years, it'll look pretty good for the Dodgers.
-
We actually scored more runs in '19 than we did in '18, amazingly enough.
-
And Cora really did push the starting pitchers that postseason, using them in relief appearances to bolster the bullpen. It worked great, but it had to take a toll.
