What do you think, the Red Sox were keeping him in AAA to punish him or something?
It seems pretty obvious they calculated that promoting him was too much of a risk because of the tax hit. And they couldn't get any other teams interested in trading for him.
They could, but I question whether anyone wants to make things any more complicated, especially with time such a factor.
It'll be interesting to see what happens, but I have a feeling it'll be pretty much same old, same old.
It's very possible that they remain in somewhat of a holding pattern this year, with so much money (and talent) coming off the backs after 2022.
I tend to agree that if they do make a splash it will be Suzuki.
I don't know that there's much expectation of the tax threshold going up significantly.
It was 210 million, and the owners wanted to reduce it to 180. My guess is they settle for a small increase from 210 million.
I've been reading highlights from it.
If it's a matter of "forming an opinion", that means they didn't say anything like that directly, which is what I would expect.
At that season-ending press conference Bloom called Bogaerts and Devers "cornerstone players" and said he wants to keep them with the team long-term.
But he said something similar about Betts not long before trading him.
The best thing is not to pay too much attention to what the brass says. They're not obligated to broadcast their plans to anyone.
Yeah, I get what you two are saying. It was just another cheap joke by me LOL
As moon alluded to on the years of control thing, it can be difficult to separate issues of money from issues of principle.