Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    55,149

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    It's pretty simple. If you're out of it you trade guys with expiring contracts. If you're still in it you don't.
  2. Bellhorn04
    I hope we're not going to have the discussion again about trading guys at the deadline when we're still in contention.
  3. Bellhorn04
    Only if we're out of it.
  4. Bellhorn04
    Eovaldi for 3 years is the answer. But like I say, he'll be looking for more.
  5. Bellhorn04
    Assuming he has a good 2022, Eovaldi is going to be more expensive than he's worth. I'd offer him 3 @ $20, but he'll likely want and get considerably more, and not from us.
  6. Bellhorn04
    This Red Sox-Twins game lasted 2:45. That's not bad.
  7. Bellhorn04
    As I said 5-2 should be a QS now.
  8. Bellhorn04
    Very good.
  9. Bellhorn04
    Sorry Max, your position has been litigated and lost and your complaints are a bit pointless now.
  10. Bellhorn04
    Wow, short thread. Good solid pitching today. Let's get over .500 tomorrow.
  11. Bellhorn04
    In incremental terms, all they offered was 1 year @ $30 mill.
  12. Bellhorn04
    I also agree with Kimmi's point that if Quality Start doesn't work for you, just go with Game Score. It's much less arbitrary.
  13. Bellhorn04
    JBJ has a 1.375 OPS in his last 2 games!
  14. Bellhorn04
    5GG likes his wordplay.
  15. Bellhorn04
    Personally I have no problem with 6 and 3 being a Quality Start. It's the 6 innings part that matters most. I get the 4.50 ERA argument. You're going to have to establish an arbitrary baseline somewhere. When you give 6 and 3 you're presumably turning the game over to your best relievers, who should arguably only give up 1 run in 3 innings. And then there's the High Quality Start, which I believe is 7 and 2.
  16. Bellhorn04
    But Game Score rewards volume of innings, correct?
  17. Bellhorn04
    David Price looked like pure quality when we signed him too. He helped win a title but has mostly been in the baggage department. And Sale is a great pitcher who they obviously thought would not be spending so little time on the field. We (the royal we) can find examples to support any position.
  18. Bellhorn04
    I guarantee that was supposed to be 5 and 2.
  19. Bellhorn04
    But a big part of the idea of the Quality Start was giving some length, not overly taxing the pen, and not giving the other team a shot at your middle relievers, which at one time was the 'dregs' of the bullpen. 3 & 0 obviously doesn't fit that bill. However, as the game changes to a total staff game, 3 & 0 does become more valuable.
  20. Bellhorn04
    Pivetta is without quality today.
  21. Bellhorn04
    You have to draw the line somewhere. Or, we can just have "Quality Outing" that applies to all pitchers, but that might be overkill.
  22. Bellhorn04
    Too radical.
  23. Bellhorn04
    There have been some players who do like staying put. Wakefield and Ortiz come to mind. They kept taking short deals and not testing free agency.
  24. Bellhorn04
    5 and 2 is clearly the new QS.
  25. Bellhorn04
    SPLINTER is usually very reliable. But the clock is indeed ticking.
×
×
  • Create New...