It's insulting when you make that offer at the same time you're signing a slightly lesser player to 6 years $140 mill, for one thing.
For another, Bogaerts ended up getting more than 3 times $90 mill. (Not that it was anything but an absurd amount that San Diego paid.)
I don't think it's as simple as you're making it sound. For example, the Devers negotiations could easily have gotten screwed up. There was nothing stopping him from waiting another year to be a free agent.
Before the extension people who were down on the team said he was gone. After the extension many of those people changed their tune to it only happened because of all the pressure blah blah blah. Funny how that works.
The Dodgers have cut way back on payroll this year, although they're still not under the first threshold, which is all kind of interesting - if you're into this crap like me, anyway.
But see how you're putting down two good moves like Mayer and Devers as if Bloom gets no credit for them?
It's like when people who don't like Dombrowski say he shouldn't get any credit just for spending a pile of money on guys like Price and JDM.
It's easy to do. If you like the guy, you find things to credit him for and ignore things he should be blamed for. And vice versa.
Why was Mookie not signed to an extension by that point, only one year from free agency? Surely that has to enter any reasonable conversation on the subject.
I think you go a little overboard in your criticism of him.
I think he did exactly what Henry hired him to do.
And he left us some pretty good prospects in Bello, Casas, Houck and Rafaela.