Bellhorn04
-
Posts
54,662 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
75
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Bellhorn04
-
If he never had great prospects, that would indicate that his failings with building farm systems resulted from bad drafts and losing picks as compensation for FA's. Just adds some clarity to the picture of his track record.
-
I think my question was easier to understand.
-
Oh, I think there have been a few.
-
Even projected WAR doesn't always mean much with relievers. For a reliever, a WAR over 2 is exceptional.
-
Sounds alright to me.
-
Question: DD takes a lot of heat for decimating the Tigers farm system. But did he trade away many prospects that went on to become stars? (Or was it just poor drafting and losing picks through FA signings?) I don't think Andrew Miller should count, since it took so long for him to emerge as what he is now.
-
Maybe Sammy Boy could be our RH DH in 2018 and play some corner infield. Can he play 3B?
-
One area where pure WAR doesn't mean that much is with relievers.
-
I'm not sure what actual issues Donaldson has caused. We know he did and said something that pissed Billy Beane off so much that he stupidly traded him. But I watch a lot of Jays games and all I've seen Donaldson do is play hard and play great.
-
The idea makes sense. Unfortunately, as with many good ideas, everybody else probably has the same one right now. And the pricing will reflect it. There's talk that Chapman is looking for 20 million a year. To me that equates to about 50 million for a starter. Enough to give one pause for thought, shall we say.
-
Now that's a quotable quote. Very nice.
-
I don't think this indicates that WAR is flawed. To me it indicates that if the player only played part of the season, you have to analyze it a little further. All part of the fun!
-
Quite right - WAR/G is the best measure of how well a guy played. Pure WAR is a combo of how well the guy played and how much he played.
-
That's not totally out of whack since it's righties he hits best. (By today's ungodly pricing.)
-
They 'buckled' because they thought we were a contender this year. Same principle as the Peavy trade in 2013.
-
This time was all Jacko's fault!
-
The Pomeranz trade had a lot in common with the Peavy trade. If you want to say we gave up too much, fine. But don't say it wasn't a need we had at the time, because it certainly was.
-
Wright was a big question mark at the time of the trade for Pomeranz. He'd had 3 rough starts in a row, and we're talking about a 31-year old who hadn't exceeded 72 innings in an MLB season. There was plenty of reason to be concerned he was about to turn into a pumpkin. And beyond that we had nothing. E-Rod was struggling, Buch looked like toast, Kelly, Owens, Johnson, Elias, O' Sullivan - our starting depth was ugly. Most of us were hoping we'd acquire another starter at the time, that's for sure.
-
I was just agreeing with Kimmi that the problem with MVP is the uncertain, subjective meaning of the 'Valuable' part.
-
2016-2017 Offseason Trade Speculation Thread
Bellhorn04 replied to Dojji's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
League average makes you a #3 pitcher by definition, and that's exactly what they needed. He averaged 6.42 innings per start - that's excellent by current standards. The 1.16 WHIP was excellent. His FIP was 3.79 which suggests he was a little unlucky. I guarantee you Ben Cherington was happy with the numbers. -
It's a huge problem.
-
2016-2017 Offseason Trade Speculation Thread
Bellhorn04 replied to Dojji's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
LOL Iggy kept helping us that year even after we traded him. Nice guy! -
But your point was 2 questions.
-
2016-2017 Offseason Trade Speculation Thread
Bellhorn04 replied to Dojji's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Peavy pitched fine in his regular season starts. Look at the innings, the ERA+ and the WHIP. He gave them just about exactly what they should have expected. -
2016-2017 Offseason Trade Speculation Thread
Bellhorn04 replied to Dojji's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Even if Peavy's numbers were a little worse than what we would have liked (and they were actually perfect #3 numbers), the reasoning behind the trade was rock-solid, and the attitude behind it was admirable, IMHO. He bolstered the staff and gave us some insurance. He gave us 6.4 innings per start and lightened the load for the bullpen. A deadline trade by a contender can't be expected to yield equal value. Look what Theo gave up for a few months from a closer.
