Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    54,666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    75

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. I think what moon is saying is that if Price and Porcello had lived up to what we were hoping for this year, Pom would be a great #4. But because those two have failed Pom is our #2.
  2. Youk is a good moderator and handles what needs to be handled. End of story. Really no need for this thread.
  3. Wow, one bad start after a bunch of good ones. Sale has had bad starts too. Reactionary much?
  4. Yep, they hit the cliff.
  5. He's not high. But tell him how old you are, mal.
  6. LOL I don't remember anything about statheads and injury prone. I remember all the others though.
  7. If you were going to be thorough about this you would have to analyze Stanton's injury history a bit. I know some of the missed games came from getting hit in the head with a pitch.
  8. Can't seem to find that data. Most of our bonehead plays this year have been on the basepaths. I'm just trying to address your question about the unearned runs. Generally speaking unearned runs will have a pretty high correlation to errors, but there will be some randomness. Most errors lead to no unearned runs. But one error can lead to 5 unearned runs.
  9. We may be a top 3 defense, but we've allowed the 5th most errors.
  10. Not necessarily weird, since unearned runs are only based on errors, which are now recognized as only one component of defense.
  11. Yes and no. Stanton's AAV is 25 million. So it might mean we wouldn't be able to extend Mookie. But maybe Mookie wants to go to free agency anyway. I don't think a trade for Stanton is a realistic possibility, it's just message board fodder. I can't see the Marlins trading him to us unless they get Benintendi or Devers back. A straight salary dump by the Marlins makes no sense. If they're in that bad of a shape the franchise is doomed anyway.
  12. Are these statements based on actual historical data?
  13. Good solid points there Nick.
  14. My guess would be yes.
  15. Because Wins Above Replacement is a whole different concept. It tries to measure actual performance eliminating luck factors. It's actually Runs Above Replacement, converted to Wins to make it a little easier to compare players.
  16. He's made all his starts since July 17. My analytical take is cross your fingers.
  17. Hmm...I have checked, double-checked, and triple-checked, and I still have 749 minus 620 coming out to 129.
  18. E-Rod is having a fine September.
  19. Chicks dig the walk.
  20. 1) Agreed about the Shaw-Thornburg trade. 2) I guess you mean because Smith has been injured. If he was healthy it was a clear win. And Miley has been horrible. 3) They were planning on getting Price to bolster the rotation so why not get the closer first. Doesn't really matter what order you do things in.
  21. You don't really deserve to be ahead by 15 games with a run differential of about 130.
  22. I think that would have been a waste. Instead of which he helped us win a game last night.
  23. When I say mostly I mean I think that's where most of the increase in other teams' numbers has come from.
  24. Personally I think whatever injury issues Hanley has had this year have been the 'nagging' kind. If he had anything serious he wouldn't be playing as much as he has. And he can still pound the ball when he does connect. I actually like Hanley in spite of it all.
  25. Oh man.
×
×
  • Create New...