Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Might be a good call.
  2. Dave's just playin' possum!
  3. That's the way it should work, but NESN ratings have been dropping even with the team winning the division 2 years in a row. Hopefully the team will be a little more fun to watch with Cora as manager.
  4. The guy that did the chat on MLBTR today thinks the free agents will soon start signing at a clip of one or two a day. That would seem to make sense. But this has been one wacky offseason. What is it, the biggest game of chicken in history or something?
  5. Frankly this is a topic I only got onto because there's absolutely nothing else going on.
  6. Such is capitalism. Personally I wouldn't mind having a billionaire for a client.
  7. Yep, case by case basis.
  8. John Henry's parents were soybean farmers. I believe he made his fortune in the market.
  9. a) It was his baseball ops people who made this particular stupid mistake, presumably. Henry's wealth from the Red Sox only continues to increase in spite of such setbacks.
  10. They didn't become billionaires by being stupid and giving money away.
  11. I'm starting to think maybe we do need a speech from Scott Boras crying collusion to liven up this offseason.
  12. We were already ahead of that curve when we got Joe Kelly and Allen Craig for John Lackey.
  13. We may be lucky the Yanks didn't get him for a similar steal.
  14. We just may be starting to see the first signs of fiscal sanity this offseason...which I guess is why it's been so boring.
  15. The foundation of the baseball economy is fan interest. Attendance is going down. I don't know about other teams' TV ratings but I know NESN ratings are down. At some point the gravy train has to hit the brakes.
  16. We still have Bill James!
  17. MLB total attendance has been gradually decreasing since 2007. 2007 total attendance 79.5 million 2017 total attendance 72.7 million
  18. Specifically how can revenue continue to increase? Is attendance increasing? Are cable TV subscriptions increasing?
  19. No, I don't think owners should keep getting a larger slice of the pie. Personally I don't see how revenue can continue to increase as it has. I think a correction is coming.
  20. No, Boras isn't the devil. Players hire him because he has a track record of getting the biggest contracts, that's no mystery. He just irks me with some of his public pronouncements, like the one about the Marlins being a 'pawn shop', and his silly statements like J D Martinez being the 'King Kong of Slug.' He's just one of those people I'd like to see taken down a peg.
  21. What's more, by changing the rules they effectively screwed Castillo even worse than he already was-as far as having a chance to play major league ball, I mean.
  22. Perhaps it also had to do with you saluting Boras's use of the term 'pawn shop' as a nice colorful metaphor.
  23. By first permitting the practice, and then forbidding it, they effectively locked Castillo in no man's land. Maybe they should have made some sort of special provision for his situation.
  24. Wow, nice redirection attempt. The Red Sox are continuing to pay Mr. Castillo, as far as I know. What happened with him was unfortunate, but it was a result of the vagaries of the rules as they were. Do you really think the Red Sox wouldn't prefer for Castillo to be giving them some production at the major league level in return for their 72.7 million dollars? You are really going off the rails with some of this stuff.
  25. Organized crime is another example of an unethical operation that 'continues to thrive'. Your point is well taken - 'continuing to thrive' doesn't mean anything as far as ethics are concerned, so why would someone even try to imply that it does?
×
×
  • Create New...